About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



130 Penn Statim 1 (2025-2026)

handle is hein.journals/statim130 and id is 1 raw text is: 





PENN STATE LAW REVIEW  PENN STATIM


Beyond the Statute's Bounds: The Case

Against Private Equitable Relief Under Civil

RICO


Matthew Gawley*


                             ABSTRACT

     This paper argues that civil plaintiffs do not have access to private
equitable reliefunder the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Act (RICO).  Different from money damages,  private equitable relief is
when  a private party asks a court to change another party's behavior: either
to make them do something or stop them from doing something. Over the
past two decades, a federal circuit split has emerged over whether RICO's
civil remedies section (§ 1964)-already a potent tool for plaintiffs-
permits individuals to seek  both monetary  and  equitable remedies.
Aligning with those circuits that find against private equitable relief, this
paper lays out three arguments:  (1) statutory interpretation of RICO
forbids private equitable relief, (2) Court precedent bars extratextual
remedies when  Congress  intended otherwise, and (3) limits on federal
equity powers prevent reading private equitable relief into civil RICO.


                         Table of Contents
I.INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................2
II.STATUTORY INTERPRETATION COMPELS THE EXCLUSION OF PRIVATE
      EQUITABLE RELIEF ....................................................................................4
      A.   The Text of Section 1964 Clearly Denies Private Equitable
           R em edies ..................................................................................... .   4
      B.   The Text of the Liberal Construction Clause Does Not Permit
           Private Equitable  R elief  ............................................................. . 5
      C.   RICO's Legislative History Reveals Congress' Intent to
           Exclude Private Equitable Relief......................................................6



    *Matthew Gawley works in the Law Department of the New York State Supreme
Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, as a Mangano-Prudenti Fellow. He earned
his J.D. from Fordham University School of Law in 2025, where he was a member of
the Fordham Environmental Law Review and the Moot Court Editorial Board. He holds a
B.A. in History and English from Colby College.


1


Vol. 130:1