About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



128 Penn Statim 1 (2023)

handle is hein.journals/statim128 and id is 1 raw text is: 








A   Bright-line Rule for the Reasonable Value

of  Medical Services


Spencer Hayes*


                            ABSTRACT

     Despite their best efforts, Pennsylvania courts have struggled to
articulate a workable standard for fixing the reasonable value of medical
services. This has profound implications for breach of implied-in-fact
contract and unjust enrichment actions related to medical services as both
center on the reasonable value of  said services. The reasonableness
standards that do exist typically ask what services are ordinarily worth in
the community, but the courts offer no guidance on how to discern this
ordinary worth. Moreover, there is no agreed upon interpretation of the
meaning   of, or  the boundaries  associated with, the  concept  of
community.  Instead, the courts must engage in an agonized, case-by-
case analysis of reasonable value. A bright-line rule would be helpful.
Fortunately, Pennsylvania law already recognizes such a rule in the unjust
enrichment context, but the rule's applicability to breaches of implied-in-
fact contract is unclear. This Article contends that the reasonable value of
medical services in all cases should be the average reimbursement rate
healthcare providers accept from third-party payors for the services
rendered.

                         Table of Contents

I. IN TR O D U C TIO N  ...............................................................................................  2
II. UNJUST ENRICHMENT VS. REAL CONTRACTS ............................................ 3
III. THE QUANTUM MERUIT CONFUSION .............................................................. 6
      A. Husik v. Lever: Community-based Standard.................................. 7
      B. Complications for the Community-based Standard.........................7
      C. Eagle v. Snyder: Regional-based Standard....................................  8
IV. QUANTUM MERUIT BY WAY  OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT ............................. 12
V. THE TEMPLE STANDARD RESOLVES THE QUANTUM  MERUIT CONFUSION ..... 14
V I. C O N CLU SIO N  ............................................................................................. 2 1


1


* Staff Attorney, Central Legal Staff, Superior Court of Pennsylvania.