About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



8 Soc. & Legal Stud. 5 (1999)

handle is hein.journals/solestu8 and id is 1 raw text is: 






  TRANSGENDER PERFORMANCE

      AND THE DISCRIMINATING

   GAZE: A CRITIQUE OF ANTI-

 DISCRIMINATION REGULATORY

                         REGIMES


                       ANDREW N. SHARPE
                  Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia


                             ABSTRACT

This article will examine the ways in which Australian anti-discrimination laws serve
to regulate transgendered persons. It will emerge that the forms of regulation
deployed vary significantly across jurisdictions. In order to appreciate the complex
relation of transgendered persons to practices of discrimination and to forms of regu-
lation, it is necessary not only to consider the category 'transgender' but to consider
also the categories of 'sex' and 'sexuality'. This is not a matter of law's blindness to
'intersectionality', of the abstraction of legal subjects from embodied particularity, but
rather a question of the interplay between these categories within specific regulatory
regimes.
  Moreover, the regulation of transgendered persons, and indeed other categories of
person protected by anti-discrimination laws, will be seen to occur in ways which call
for a re-examination of rights critiques which attempt an interrogative interpretation
of rights. The article contends that Australian anti -discrimination laws are marked by
a shift from an interrogative to a performative mode of regulation. That is to say, anti-
discrimination laws are to be comprehended not by reference to the 'immutability' of
some attribute or characteristic but rather in the interplay of performance and gaze.
This regulatory shift is one which serves to problematize, rather than ossify, extant
legal categories.

   When you meet a human being, the first distinction you make is 'male' or
   'female?' and you are accustomed to make the distinction with unhesitating cer-
   tainty. (Freud, 1964)

   But it seems we are as we appear. What a nonsense we make of our hatreds when
   we can only recognise them in the most obvious circumstances. (Winterson,
   1996)


       SOCIAL & LEGAL STUDIES 0964 6639 (199903) 8:1 Copyright © 1999
       SAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi,
                         Vol. 8(1), 5-24; 007096