About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



78 Rutgers U. L. Rev. Comments. 1 (2025-2026)

handle is hein.journals/rgsusty78 and id is 1 raw text is: 











  VICTIM   RESTRICTIONS: INCONSISTENCY IN RAPE VICTIM
                        ABORTION ACCESS

                        Thomas   C. Stimson*

                              ABSTRACT

       Sexual violence is as uncomfortable a topic as it is a prevalent
    occurrence. Our society treats individuals who become pregnant
    because of their victimization with a unique pity reserved for only
    the truly innocent. However, a victim's right to relief from such a
    crime and  their right to reproductive health are now at odds in
    the post-Dobbs political atmosphere. Beginning  in the 1970s,
    bipartisan support  swelled to protect crime victims in what
    scholars call the Victims'Rights Movement. At the same time, the
    Supreme  Court  was developing its view of abortion access as a
    privacy right. While the Victims'Rights Movement may have left
    the political zeitgeist, the right to abortion has swirled from a
    protected privacy right to a moral debate of innocence. This view
    of guilt and innocence  becomes even  more complicated  when
    states seemingly abandon  the widely popular rape  and incest
    exception for abortion access. Separated by decades of legislation,
    some   states now  face  a  conflict between  their professed
    commitment   to the rights of crime victims and the rights of the
    unborn. In addition to drawing attention to these inconsistencies,
    this commentary  posits that how  we  choose to address these
    conflicting rights expands far beyond social injustices furthered
    by abortion bans.

                         TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.    IN TR ODU CTION ............................................................................. .   2
II.   B A C K G R O U N D .....................................................................................3
      A.  Roe, Dobbs, and Abortion Restrictions................................3
      B .  Victim s'R ights  M ovem ent .........................................................7


      J.D. Candidate 2026, Rutgers Law School. I am grateful to Professor Lee Carpenter
for her advice and feedback on this note. Special thanks to Professor Kimberly Mutcherson,
whose research inspired this topic, and to my family, friends, and partner for their love and
support.


1