About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



8 Prison J. 1 (1928)

handle is hein.journals/prsjrnl8 and id is 1 raw text is: 





   VOLUME   VIII, No. 1                      JANUARY,   1928
                             THE


     PRISON JOURNAL
            DEVOTED  TO  THE SCIENCE  OF PENOLOGY
                      Published Quarterly by
           THE  PENNSYLVANIA PRISON SOCIETY
                         (Organized 1787)
                311 South Juniper St., Philadelphia, Pa.

This Number  (Twenty Cents)                   Fifty Cents a Year

            THE   NATIONAL CRIME COMMISSION
    The  most outstanding event of 1927 in penological movements
was  the  conference at Washington, D.  C., early in November,
on the subject of Crime Reduction, though the proceedings of the
Assembly  were not exactly confined to this particular phase of the
crime situation. The Conference was held under the care and auspices
of the National Crime Commission, a  voluntary organization with
headquarters in New  York City.  We  have understood that every
State in the Union sent delegates. From the Probation Bulletin we
learn that among those present were Governors, attorney generals,
lawyers, judges, police chiefs, heads of correctional institutions, mem-
bers of crime commissions. More than fifty organizations dealing with
crime and its problems, working, many of them, for the improvement
in methods of treating criminals, were officially represented.
    Brief reports were presented from a number of Crime Commis-
sions from every part of the United States.
    Richard Washburn  Child, Chairman of the National Crime Com-
mission, was unavoidably absent but sent a paper dealing with the
progress, or lack of progress, in our onslaught on crime within the
last ten years. A review of legislative enactment and effort in many
of the States was illuminating.
    The subjects brought before this Conference covered a wide range.
We  heard about the success of the Bankers' Vigilantes in Iowa
and Illinois; about the difficulties encountered in preventing the opera-
tions of the fence; we heard pro and con in regard to the Baumes
Law  in New York State; the indeterminate sentence was opposed and
defended; prison labor was discussed in its various phases; the advant-
ages of phychiatric examinations were ably presented.