About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



41 Prison J. 2 (1961)

handle is hein.journals/prsjrnl41 and id is 1 raw text is: 









                      EDITORIAL


    A  'break-through' in corrections, though perhaps hoped for as in
other areas of human  relations, is not suggested by any of the cor
tributors to this issue.
    Gresham   M. Sykes, in his article The Future of Penology, sug-
gests that . . . as far as the short run future is concerned, the field
of penology  may well get worse before it gets better. He develOPs
a thoroughly  plausible case and concludes with what must  he done
for long term  advance.
     A growing  body of  theory and accepted principles is showiI,9
an increasing tendency to stand firm on some universal concepts. Yet,
practices lag far behind . . . writes Milton Burdinan in his Oren
tation of the Prisoner to the Correctional Process. He draws  Pt
initial findings of the International Survey of Corrections, observing
that none  of the 'processing' of the newly received prisoners attacks
the  real problem  of orientation which  is to 'influence the prison
culture massively' at the point at which it is most vulnerable. He
also discusses the orientation program of California.
     Ralph  W.  England,  Jr., in New  Departures  in Prison Lalbor
 questions whether over 75 years experience with the 'state use' syStIl
 has proven its worth and suggests that the most promising develOP
 ment is the integration of prison labor with the free economy.
     Almost every reform of recent years has resulted in the eliuinI
 tion of some of the prison-like qualities of prison, according to N in
 man  Johnston, who  describes new  designs, colors and materials ic-
 the Changing  Fare  of Correctional Architecture. He  discusses (
 emphasis of security and reducing the effects of size.
     Recent  Developments   in the  Treatment   and  Disposition
 Military Offenders, by Ben Overstreet, reports on the demonstrate
 value of special counselors who   are always available, backed  Iy
 professional teams of psychiatrists, psychologists and social work s
 He  attests to the effectiveness of these services in the prograiO
 counselling, problem solving, training and useful work.
     Such a sampling  of problems on the path to progress, and sign5
 of actual advances being made should serve as a guide to the 'practica'
 and 'realistic' legislator and prison administrator. Although no cl
 acea is suggested, there are indications of movement that are a e*
 lenge to the concerned  layman, to the practitioner and  to the re-
 searcher.


2