About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



26 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. [i] (2026)

handle is hein.journals/pepds26 and id is 1 raw text is: 






                    PEPPERDINE



        DISPUTE RESOLUTION



                 LAW JOURNAL


                 VOL. XXVI I ISSUE ONE

                                2026



                              CONTENTS


ARTICLES

DISPUTE REVIEW BOARDS AND THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY: THE SONG REMAINS THE SAME OR DOES IT?
............................................................................................................................................................1
                                                      DANIEL D. MCMILLAN

THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR CROWDSOURCED ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION: REVISITING THE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION TRIANGLE .......................................................................................................................58
                                                 YUN ZHAO AND ZHIMING X1AO

HIDING ELEPHANTS IN MOUSEHOLES: JUDICIAL (MIS)APPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT TO
ATTORNEY-CLIENT ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS .....................................................................................95
                                                        GREGORY L. SMITH


COMMENTS

AN ALTERNATIVE SACRIFICE: RELIGIOUS ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN MINISTERIAL EMPLOYMENT
CONTRACTS ......................................................................................................................................109
                                                         GRACE E. BRANDT

OFF THE GRIDIRON CONFLICT: WHY THE NFL SHOULD USE MEDIATION TO RESOLVE INTERNAL DISPUTES
........................................................................................................................................................143
                                                         BRYAN WEITZMAN

STITCHING UP INDUSTRY ISSUES: ARBITRATION CAN OFFER CUSTOMIZED SOLUTIONS TO FASHION
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISPUTES ....................................................................................................163
                                                          CATHERINE MENG