About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



28 Psych., Crime & L. 1 (2022)

handle is hein.journals/pcyceadl28 and id is 1 raw text is: PSYCHOLOGY, CRIME & LAW
2022, VOL. 28, NO. 1, 1-19
https://doi.org/1 0.1080/1068316X.2021.1876051

Routledge
Taylor & Francis Group

Co-occurrences among interrogation tactics in actual criminal
investigations*
Jeffrey Kaplan    and Brian Cutler
Faculty of Social Science and Humanities, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON, Canada
ABSTRACT                                                        ARTICLE HISTORY
During  police interrogations, trained investigators may use    Received 29 June 2020
different tactics to elicit information from  criminal suspects.  Accepted 9 November 2020
Through this exploratory research, we investigated which tactics
were used most frequently by investigators in actual police     KEYWORDS
interrogations and how they used tactics in combination. We interrogation strategies;
coded 50 videotaped interrogations recorded in North America    interrogation observation;
for 25 unique tactics as they were used by investigators. We    suspect questioning; suspect
divided each interrogation into 3-minute time blocks, counted interviews
the tactics that were used within each time block, and conducted
a principal component analysis on those frequencies. We
expected our analyses to reveal patterns of tactic use but had no
a priori hypotheses about how investigators would combine and
sequence interrogation tactics. Presenting evidence was the most
common tactic, and investigators used minimization more than
maximization tactics. The tactics grouped into seven components,
indicating that they had been used by investigators within the
same time blocks. Post hoc examination of those components
revealed that tactics used in temporal proximity shared logical
connections and segued into one another to form multifaceted
persuasive messages. For instance, making accusations and
increasing suspects' guilt were often employed before offering
justifications. This  research  provides  insight  into  how
interrogation  tactics relate to  one  another during  police
interrogations.
North American police officers who are first responders likely question potential suspects
in an ad hoc manner; these officers generally do not receive extensive training in inter-
view and interrogation methods (Bradford & Pynes, 1999) and often have little time or
information on which to base a strategy of suspect questioning. Contrastingly, once an
investigation has been conducted and a suspect identified and taken into custody, the
proceeding interviews and interrogations are highly structured (Leo, 2008). At the broad-
est level, suspect questioning strategies are typically divided into information-gathering
interviews and accusatory interrogations. Information-gathering methods, such as
PEACE (Milne & Bull, 1999), are premised on rapport building and eliciting full
CONTACT Jeffrey Kaplan  Jeffrey.Kaplan@ontariotechu.net  Faculty of Social Science and Humanities, Ontario
Tech University, 2000 Simcoe St North, Oshawa, ON, Canada L1H 7K4
*An earlier version of this research was previously presented at the 2019 AP-LS Conference. The data associated with this
research are available through the Center for Open Science at https://osf.io/g5u7q/
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group