About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



17 Psych., Crime & L. 1 (2011)

handle is hein.journals/pcyceadl17 and id is 1 raw text is: Psychology, Crime & Law                                              |  Routledge
Vol. 17, No. 1, January 2011, 1                                         T Tayor&FrandsGroup
Editor's introduction to the special edition
As readers of this journal will know, those individuals who come to the attention of
the criminal justice system come in many guises. For various purposes, within both
practice and research, distinctions are made between offenders according to a range
of criteria; these criteria include the individual's personal characteristics such as their
age or gender, or personality, or psychological and intellectual functioning, or risk
of further delinquency. Indeed, some of these characteristics define whole areas of
research within criminology generally and psychology and crime specifically.
One particular longstanding niche within criminological research and legal
practice concerns the interplay between intellectual disability and criminal beha-
viour. The coexistence of intellectual disability and criminal behaviour has raised
three basic forensic issues for a long time. First, there is the matter of criminal
responsibility: can people with an intellectual disability be held to be culpable for
their actions in the same way as people without such a disability? If the answer to this
question is negative, then a means of assessing reliably the individual's intellectual
functioning and risk to the community needs to be established in order that the
law can be applied fairly. Second, given that this group exists within the criminal
justice and mental health systems, the provision of services (in terms of both
physical facilities and professional input) relies on an understanding of the level of
prevalence and the characteristics, psychological and criminological, of offenders
with intellectual disabilities. Third, the critical question is whether services for this
group work in that they reduce reoffending and enable the individual to return safely
to the community.
These issues are all addressed in detail in an excellent group of papers drawn
together by Bill Lindsay and his colleagues. The material they present in this special
issue has the collective weight of scholarship that comes from experts and is a
master class on the topic of offenders with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
I learned a great deal from reading the material and I'm confident that other readers
of the journal will do likewise.
Clive Hollin
ISSN 1068-316X print/ISSN 1477-2744
© 2011 Taylor & Francis
DOI: 10.1080/10683160903392186
http://www.informaworld.com