About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



95 Pol. Sci. Q. 1 (1980-1981)

handle is hein.journals/pclscceqry95 and id is 1 raw text is: 








Institutional Development of Parties


             and the Thesis of Party Decline










                                              CORNELIUS P. COTTER
                                                         JOHN F. BIBBY

             The  theories by which social scientists attempt to explain complex
social trends are necessarily partial and grounded upon limited expertise and
particular experiences. In a disconcerting way, such theories tend to be out-
stripped by the pace of the change that they are designed to explain, and obser-
vation and  data collecting continue to be guided by the partially outmoded
theories.
  The recognition by scholars that events are occurring in combinations that do
not conform  to theory can be a wrenching experience. Economists and govern-
ment  decision makers are perplexed by  the anomaly  of recession and rising
unemployment   accompanied   by rising interest rates and increasing inflation.
This conjunction does not conform  to the expectations derived from accepted
economic  theory.
  Political scientists, pushing the concept of electoral realignment to the limits
of its logic and working from the methodological strength of survey and attitu-
dinal research, have formulated and tested a theory of politics that leads them to
conclude that American  political parties are in steady decline and may verge
upon  extinction. The electorate's declining commitment to party, the apparent
lessened interest of activists in party organization, and the salience of personal-
ity and issue over party loyalty are indicators of party decline. This conclusion
may  have merit when considered in terms of the capacity of party organizations
to broker presidential nominations  or manage  presidential campaigns. This
article presents evidence supporting a contrary thesis; that is, while national
parties are less involved than in the past in controlling presidential nominations,

CORNELIUS  P. COTTER and JOHN F. BIBBY are professors of political science at the University
of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Cotter is the coauthor of Politics Without Power: The National Party
Committees, and Bibby is coauthor of On Capitol Hill: Studies in the Legislative Process.


Political Science Quarteriy Volume 95 Number 1 Spring 1980