About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


43 Pace L. Rev. 1 (2022-2023)

handle is hein.journals/pace43 and id is 1 raw text is: PACE LAW REVIEW Volume 43 Fall 2022 Number 1 Mutually Intelligible Principles? Andrew J. Ziaja* 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 2 II. WAYMAN IN SCHOLARLY DEBATE FROM NONDELEGATION TO M AJOR Q UESTIONS....................................................................................... 5 A. Debate Between Whitman and Gundy.........................................7 B. D ebate Since Gundy ..........................................................................14 III. FOLLOWING WAYMAN FROM GUNDY THROUGH JARKESY AND W EST V IRGINIA.......................................................................................... 24 A. Gundy v. United States................................................................ 24 B. Jarkesy v. SE C................................................................................... 27 C. W est Virginia v. EPA .................................................................... 33 IV. A MORE FAITHFUL READING OF WAYMAN............................................ 43 V . C O N CLU SIO N ....................................................................................................5 0 Abstract Are the nondelegation, major questions, and political question doc- trines mutually intelligible? This article asks whether there is more than superficial resemblance between the nondelegation, major questions, and political question concepts in Wayman v. Southard, 23 U.S. (10 Wheat.) 1 (1825), an early nondelegation case that has become focal in recent nondelegation and major questions scholarship and *M.P.A. magna cum laude, Sciences Po (Paris Institute of Political Studies); J.D., Uni- versity of California, College of the Law, San Francisco (formerly UC Hastings); Grad- uate Fellowship, History, University of California, Berkeley; B.A. with honors and dis- tinction, History, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Andrew Ziaja is an attorney serving with the National Labor Relations Board in Washington, D.C., and a former partner at Leonard Carder LLP in San Francisco and Oakland, California. The views expressed in this article are his alone and not those of the National Labor Relations Board, the United States Government, or any other entity. All errors are also his alone. He would like to especially thank Sonya Ziaja and Brigham Daniels for their thought- ful readings. 1