About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



49 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 1 (2024)

handle is hein.journals/nyuls49 and id is 1 raw text is: 








     THE UNMAKING OF CONFLICT: A CRT-TWAIL
     ANALYSIS OF THE CASES OF COLOMBIA AND
                        PALESTINE(-ISRAEL)-

                                   ABSTRACT

     This Article applies a CRT-TWAIL  analysis to the cases ofColombia and Pal-
estine. Critical Race Theory studies how race holds legal meaning.  Third World
Approaches   to International Law examines  how  colonialism became  modern  in-
ternational law. Through  two case studies of conflict, this Article presents the
instrumentality of an applied joint CRT-TWAIL  analysis. A CRT-TWAIL framing
of the case study of Afro-Colombians,  Indigenous  Colombians,  and the  armed
conflict in Colombia shows how  transitional justice fails to address colonial rac-
ism. A CRT-TWAIL framing of the case study of   Palestine  under the Zionist, ra-
cialized, and militarized order reveals how occupation law can obfuscate Pales-
tinian self-determination. The Article demonstrates that in uncovering the reality
of legalized and racialized conflicts,  a joint CRT-TWAIL lens can create net-
works  of solidarity between similarly positioned groups worldwide to decolonize
the law.











    oc In March 2022, I participated in PalTrek. I witnessed firsthand the Israeli settler-colonial
military occupation and  apartheid regime  whose  objective is  the  genocide of
Indigenous Palestinians, as explicitly seen since October 8, 2023. UN NEwS, Rights Expert Finds
Reasonable  Grounds'  Genocide  is Being  Committed  in  Gaza  (Mar.  26,  2024),
https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/03/1147976 [https://perma.cc/38BQ-YMC6]; see A Textbook
Case of Genocide : Israeli Holocaust Scholar Raz Segal Decries Israel's Assault on Gaza,
DEMOCRACY  Now!  (Oct. 16, 2023), https://www.democracynow.org/2023/10/16/razsegaltext-
book case of genocide [https://perma.cc/4UXF-DPS4].
    In occupied Palestine, I immersed myself in the counternarrative conversation to advocate for
Palestinian liberation. This article contributes to that counternarrative work. I wrote the first draft of
this article in spring 2022. A lot has changed but the call remains the same: free Palestine.
    I am grateful to the RLSC editors for welcoming scholarship about Palestine in a time of ex-
treme censorship of Palestinian voices and content. See, e.g., Toward Nakba as a Legal Concept:
Meet the Palestinian Lawyer Censored by Columbia and Harvard, DEMOCRACY Now! (June 5,
2024), https://www.democracynow.org/2024/6/5/harvard_columbia_law_school_nakba_censorship
[https://perma.cc/GF35-74LF; and https://perma.cc/P2LK-77EH] (including the censored article
which is a necessary read).
    I am grateful for the editors' work on this article. All errors remain mine.


                                        1


Imaged  with Permission of N.Y.U. Review  of Law & Social Change