About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



23 Nw. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 1 (2025-2026)

handle is hein.journals/nwteintp23 and id is 1 raw text is: 









Copyright 2025 by Nikola L. Datzov                                    Volume 23, Number 1 (2025)
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property





Al   JURISPRUDENCE: TOWARD AUTOMATED

JUSTICE



                                                                  Nikola   L. Datzov*



                                   TABLE OF CONTENTS



     I.   INTRODUCTION   .........................................................................................................2
     II.  THE FEDERAL  JUDICIARY'S PATH  TOWARD  AUTOMATED JUSTICE......................... 6
         A.   First Evolution: The Evolving Role ofU.S. Judges                         6
         B.   Second  Evolution: A Shift to a Digital Judiciary                       10
         C.   Third Evolution: Fewer  Trials ButMore Judicial Work?                   12
     III. FOURTH  EVOLUTION:  RISE OF THE Al JUDGE ......................................................  17
         A.   The AI Revolution                                                       17
         B.   AI's (Current) Capabilities forJudicial Work                            21
         C.   International Courts'Adoption  of AI                                    25
         D.    U.S. Courts'Adoption of AI                                             28
     IV.  TOWARD  AUTOMATED JUSTICE-A TAXONOMY FOR Al JUDGES ........................ 30
         A.   Behind  the Chambers Door    What Judges Actually Do                    31




 Nikola L. Datzov is an Associate Professor of Law at the University of North Dakota School of Law.
 Before becoming a law professor, he had the privilege to serve as a law clerk for judges at the U.S. Court
 of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota.
 I am grateful to all who offered invaluable feedback on earlier versions of this Article: Jonas Anderson,
 Barton Beebe, Sarah Belliston, Larry Birnbaum, Doni Bloomfield, Oren Bracha, Bernard Chao, Bryan
 Choi, Jorge Contreras, Dennis Crouch, Deven Desai, Laura Dolbow, John Duffy, Tabrez Ebrahim, A.
 Michael Froomkin, Katrina Geddes, Aman Gebru, Michael Goodyear, Neel Guha, Yan Fang, Kevin
 Frazier, Renee Henson, Tim Hsieh, Tim Holbrook, Mark Janis, Eric Johnson, Valerie Koch, Christa
 Laser, Mark Lemley, Dan Lewerenz, Giovanna Massarotto, Jonathan Masur, Sari Mazzurco, Michael
 McGinniss, Andrew Michaels, Viva Moffat, Amy Motomura, Andres Sawicki, Brian Pappas, Stephanie
 Plamondon, Lala Qadir, Blake Reid, Nathan Reitinger, Mark Riedl, Jessica Roberts, Zvi Rosen, Alan
 Rozenshtein, David Rubenstein, Matthew Sag, Peter Salib, David Schwartz, David Simon, Sean
 Seymore, Marvin Slepian, Hayley Stillwell, Benjamin Sundholm, Andrew Torrance, Anoo Vyas,
 Christopher Yoo, and Peter Yu. I am especially grateful to The Honorable Diane Wood and Michael
 Livermore for serving as commentators on the paper for the Eighth Junior Faculty Forum for Law and
 STEM, as well as the discussants at the forum. I also benefitted from the opportunity to hear ideas and
feedback from presentations of this project at the University of Missouri Al and Society: Government,
Policy, and the Law conference, JIPSA 2024-2025 Winter Workshops, 2024 Rocky Mountain  IP
Workshop, Eighth Annual Texas A&M   Intellectual Property Scholars Roundtable, WIPIP 2025, the
Fourth Annual Scholars Roundtable on Artificial Intelligence, Central States Law Schools Association
2025 Scholarship Conference, and the UND Law Faculty Research Series. A word of appreciation is also
certainly due to Justin Penney and Liam Waugh for their excellent research assistance. Many thanks as
well to the editors of the Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property for their astute
and helpful suggestions and revisions. Of course, the views in the Article are my own.


I