About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



2025 Jury Expert [1] (2025)

handle is hein.journals/jurexp32 and id is 1 raw text is: 




Understanding   Family-Oriented  Jurors  Through  Locus  of Control: How  Social Media
Insights Can  Shape Trial Strategy

Modern  jurors are impacted by a bevy of attitudes, experiences and biases which affect their
decision-making  in the courtroom. One such worldview that influences juror perspectives is
locus of control (LOC). LOC describes an individual's perception about the causation of events
in their lives. Jurors can generally fall into two categories: those with an internal locus of control
and those with an external locus of control. Attorneys and trial consultants who recognize these
traits are better equipped to tailor their case presentations effectively. Increasingly, social media
serves as a goldmine for assessing these psychological nuances.

The  Basics of Locus of Control: Internal vs. External

Individuals who exhibit an internal locus of control fundamentally believe their successes and
failures result from personal effort, choices, and discipline. Such jurors are likely to scrutinize
the specific decisions made by plaintiffs and defendants carefully, emphasizing personal
responsibility and individual accountability. They may critically evaluate whether parties
involved acted responsibly, negligently, or recklessly.

Alternatively, jurors with an external locus of control perceive outcomes as shaped primarily by
forces outside their personal influence such as fate, luck, systemic biases, or environmental
circumstances. These jurors often focus less on individual choice and more on context, societal
forces, or external pressures influencing actions. They might sympathize with parties who appear
disadvantaged by systemic issues, chance, or uncontrollable events.

By  accurately identifying a juror's LOC, attorneys gain a strategic advantage in aligning their
narratives with the psychological predispositions of jurors. Doing so often involves delving into
their social media presence, where several indicators can help identify whether a given juror has
an internal or external locus of control.

Social Media:  The New  Frontier in Juror Profiling

Social media has dramatically altered jury selection dynamics by providing unique insights into
jurors' psychological tendencies and decision-making styles, including LOC. The content jurors
share publicly on social media, whether it be personal experiences, opinions, or reactions to news
and events, can reveal crucial information about their LOC. However, not all social media
content is equally revealing. Effective profiling hinges on pinpointing specific indicators rather
than generalizing from ambiguous or superficial content.

When  examining  social media content to discern locus of control, precision matters. A broad
overview, such as noting a juror's frequent posting about family activities, does not necessarily
illuminate their internal or external locus clearly. Rather, specific posts reflecting attitudes about
responsibility, personal effort, external influence, or systemic fairness provide the most
actionable insights.