About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


1894 J. Sup. Ct. U.S. 1 (1894-1895)

handle is hein.journals/joscus1894 and id is 1 raw text is: t SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. MONDAY, OCTOBER 8, 1894. Present : The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Field, Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Gray, Mr. Justice Brewer, Mr. Justice Brown, Mr. Justice Shiras, Mr. Justice Jackson, and Mr. Justice White. The Chief Justice said: As the gentlemen of the bar are aware, it has been the custom of the court to adjourn on the first day of the term, in order to enable its mem- bers to pay their respects to the President of the United States in a body; but, as the President is absent, we will dispose of such business as may be properly brought before us before taking the usual adjournment. Robert Thorne, of ---; Frank L. Fish, of Vergennes, Vt. ; Wil- liam H. Bliss, of Burlington, Vt.; William M. Eccles, of St. Louis, Mo.; C. C. Wright, of Modesto, Cal.; Samuel A. Putnam, of Washington, D. C.; Thomas G. Hayes, of Baltimore, Md.; William S. Bryan, jr., of Baltimore, Md.; Frank Gosnell, of Baltimore, Md.; George R. Simp- son, of Washington, D. C.; George L. Morton, of Washington, D. C.; Charles E. Wilson, of San Francisco, Cal.; Frederick E. Chapin, of Washington, D. C., and William Quinby, of Boston, Mass., were admitted to practice. No. 28.-The Northern Pacific Railroad Company, plaintiff in error vs. Henry Bush. In error to the circuit court of the United States for the northern district of Illinois. Submission set aside and cause dismissed with costs on motion of Mr. A. H. Garland for the plaintiff in error. No. 630.-Mrs. Lillian W. Egan and husband, plaintiffs in error, vs. A. Hart et al. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted by Mr. A. H. Leonard in support of motions and by Mr. Charles J. Boatner in opposi- tion thereto. No. 3.-The Pittsburgh and Southern Coal Company, plaintiff in error, vs. John W. Bates, sheriff, etc., and No. 10.-ThePittsburghand Southern Coal Company, plaintiff in error, vs. the State of Louisiana for use of the Charity Hospital of New Orleans. Passed subject to the provisions of section 9 of rule 26 on motion of Mr. Frederic D. McKenney in behalf of counsel.