About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


1889 J. Sup. Ct. U.S. 1 (1890)

handle is hein.journals/joscus1889 and id is 1 raw text is: SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. MONDAY, MARCH 3, 1890. Present: The Chief Justice and all the Afsociate Justices. Harvey D. Hadlock, Boston; Sam. G. Derrickson, New York; Joseph C. Ely and Arthur L. Brown, of Providence, R. I.; James G. Day, Des Moines; John Schomp, Omaha; E. J. Hadley, Boston; John S. Run- nels, Chicago; B. W. Ritter, Durango, Colo.; Geo. F. Patrick, Pueblo, Colo.; Wm. W. Scott, Emporia, Kans.: G. W. Fitch, Albion, N. Y.; and W. H. Taft, Cincinnati, were admitted to practice. No. 195.-The inhabitants of the township of Bernards, p. e., vs. Thos. H. Morrison et al., in error to the circuit court pf the United States for the district of New Jersey; judgment affirmed with costs and interesti Opinion by Mr. Justice Brewer. (Mr. Justice Field took no part in the decision of this case.) No. 1274.-The County of Lincoln, p. e., vs. Nicholas Luning. No. 1275.-The County of Lincoln, p. e., vs. Chas. Sutro. No. 1276.-The County of Lincoln vs. C. D. Vincent; judgment affirmed with costs and interest. Opinion by Mr. Justice Brewer. . No. 1195.-The Louisville, New Orleans and Texas Railway vs. The State of Mississippi, in error to the supreme court of the State of Missis- sippi; judgment affirmed with costs. Opinion by Mr. Justice Brewer. (Dissenting, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Bradley.) No. 1421.-Wm. D. McKey, p. e., vs. The Village of Hyde Park, in error to the circuit court of the United States for the northern district of Illinois; judgment reversed, with costs, and case remanded with a direction to order a new trial, and to take such further proceedings as shall not be inconsistent with the opinion of the court. Opinion by Justice Lamar No. 1081.-James D. Crenshaw, app.; vs. United States; appeal frot the Court of Claims; judgment affirmed. Opinion by Mr. Justice Lamar No. 1514.-Chas. A. Gregory, app., vs. John G. Stetson; appeal fro the circuit court of the United States for the district of Massachuse' decree affirmed with costs. Opinion by Mr. Justice Lamar. Digitized from Best Copy Available