About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. i (2002-2003)

handle is hein.journals/johnmars2 and id is 1 raw text is: Issuc I MASTHEAD LLrrER FiROM rIL EDITOR Articls Hon, Richard [i41 A Sx-rposim.n on lleaua ui Propr 'y Cc S,;o.; red by The Woodrow Wilson Bradiey C. Wright janice M. Muefer Dana Beldiman Comments Victoria A. Grzeiak Matk i. Hopkins, Ph.D. St'rlhen L.Sheidon Himansh Vyas EFFECTIVE APPELLATE PRACTICE BEFORE THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 2 J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L. 1 (2002) THE GENETIC AGE: WHO OWNS THE GENOME? 2 J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L. 6 (2002) BUSINESS METHOD PATENTS: ARE THERE ANY LIMITS? 2 J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L. 30 (2002) INTERPRETIVE NECROMANCY OR PRUDENT PATENT POLICY? THE SUPREME COURT'S ARISING UNDER BLUNDER IN HOLMES GROUP V. VORNADO 2 J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L. 57 (2002) AN INFORMATION SOCIETY APPROACH TO PRIVACY LEGISLATION: HOW TO ENHANCE PRIVACY WHILE MAXIMIZING INFORMATION VALUE 2 J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L. 71 (2002) MICKEY MOUSE & SONNY BONO Go TO COURT: THE COPYRIGHT TERM EXTENSION ACT AND ITS EFFECT ON CURRENT AND FUTURE RIGHTS 2 J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L. 95 (2002) HAS THE REASONABLE EXPERIMENTATION DOCTRINE BECOME UNREASONABLE?: RETHINKING THE REASONABLE EXPERIMENTATION DOCTRINE IN LIGHT OF AUTOMATED EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES 2 J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L. 116 (2002) A PRACTICAL SOLUTION TO CLAIM CONSTRUCTION: STOPGAP MEASURES WHILE WAITING FOR REFORM 2 J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L. 138 (2002) FEDERAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW V. STATE SOVEREIGNTY: CAN CONGRESS WIN? 2 J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L. 159 (2002) volume 2 Fall 2002