About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



2 J.L. Teaching & Learning 1 (2025)

handle is hein.journals/jnlolwtch2 and id is 1 raw text is: 



SYMPOSIUM INTRODUCTION


INTERROGATING THE HIDDEN CURRICULUM:
IMPLICATIONS FOR FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL
IDENTITY


David I. C. Thomson*

    In its landmark 2007 report on legal education, the Carnegie
Foundation  for the Advancement of Teaching focused its strongest
criticism on the conclusion that law schools were not paying sufficient
attention to the formation of professional identity in their students.1
This was a relatively new concept to legal educators, although one
they may  have addressed occasionally in some courses and clinical
offerings.2 But the Carnegie Report put a spotlight on the obligation
as follows: The apprenticeship of professional identity ... include[s]
the virtues of integrity, consideration, civility, [and] conceptions of
the personal meaning that legal work has for practicing attorneys and
their sense of responsibility toward the profession.3
    It is instructive to remember that the Carnegie Report was part of
a series of reports on education for the professions and included
reports on the training of doctors, nurses, clergy, and engineers.4 In
each   report, Carnegie  Foundation   authors  emphasized   the
professional formation of the student.5 However, perhaps because the
legal profession already had a code of professional conduct6 and the
ABA  already required every law school to teach professional ethical
rules,7 many legal educators did not understand what exactly was
missing. It did not help that the report unintentionally blurred the
distinction between the required course in ethics (and its emphasis on
the ethical rules) that has long been a part of legal education and the
new  concept introduced in the report: theformation ofprofessional


* Professor of the Practice of Law and John C. Dwan Professor of Online
Learning, University of Denver, Sturm College of Law.
1 See WILLIAM M. SULLIVAN ET AL., EDUCATING LAWYERS: PREPARATION FOR
THE PROFESSION OF LAW 14 (2007) [hereinafter Carnegie Report].
2 See id. at 12-14.
3 Id. at 132.
4 Id. at 15.
5 See Anne Colby & William Sullivan, Formation ofProfessionalism and
Purpose: Perspectives from the Preparationfor the Professions Program,
5 THOMAS L.J. 404, 405, 410 (2008).
6 MODEL RULES OF PRO. CONDUCT PMBL. PARA. 7 (AM. BARASS'N 2013).
7 ABA STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL OF L. SCHS., Standard 303(a)(1) (2023-24).