About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



32 J. Legal Stud. Educ. 1 (2015)

handle is hein.journals/jlse32 and id is 1 raw text is: 



Journal ofLegal Studies Education
Volume  32, Issue 1, 1-46, Winter 2015




Contract Formation and Performance

Under the UCC and CISG: A

Comparative Case Study

Kurt  M.  Saunders*   and  Leonard  Rymsza**




  The great object of the law is to encourage commerce.'



1.  INTRODUCTION

A  contract for the sale of goods is often the end product of extensive ne-
gotiations between the parties, and it embodies their expectations and sets
out the details of their agreement. If a dispute arises, the contract will be
the starting point for determining the rights and liabilities of the parties.
Moreover,  the law that governs the agreement will determine whether a valid
contract exists, how it will be interpreted, and what remedies are available for
its breach. Contracts for the sale of goods in the United States are governed
by the Uniform   Commercial  Code   (UCC)  in every state but one.2 When
one  of the parties to the contract is based in another country, however, the
conflict of laws principles that will determine which country's law governs
the transaction can be confounding.3 In addition, the commercial laws and


*Professor of Business Law, California State University, Northridge.
**Emeritus Professor of Business Law, California State University, Northridge.
'Beale v. Thompson, 3 Bos. & Pull. 405, 421, 127 Eng. Rep. 221 (C.P. 1803).
2Unif. Commercial Code Sections 1-3B U.L.A. (2002) [hereinafter U.C.C.]. The U.C.C. has
been adopted in some form by all fifty states, the District of Columbia, as well as Puerto Rico,
Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Louisiana has adopted it with the exception of Article 2. All
references in this article are to the 2002 version of the U.C.C.
3The rights and duties of the parties as to a contract are determined by the local law of the state
which, with respect to that issue, has the most significant relationship to the transaction and the
parties. RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONFLICTS OF LAW § 188(1) (1971).
© 2015 The Authors
journal of Legal Studies Education © 2015 Academy of Legal Studies in Business
                                    I