About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



39 J. L. Econ. & Org. 1 (2023)

handle is hein.journals/jleo39 and id is 1 raw text is: 
JLE0 V39, N1 1


Judicial Review by the People Themselves: Democracy
and   the  Rule   of  Law   in  Ancient Athens

      Federica Carugati*
      King's College London, UK

      Randall Calvert
      Washington University in St. Louis, USA

      Barry R. Weingast
      Stanford University, USA




      Modern democratic constitutions mediate the tension between democracy and
      the rule of law through institutions that check unrestrained popular rule with ex-
      pert judicial bodies. This paper considers the alternative arrangement that
      existed in ancient Athens, where checks on popular rule coexisted with strong
      popular control. Judicial review in Athens, however, raised two additional
      threats to democracy and the rule of law: unpredictability and partisanship. We
      combine a formal model  with historical exegesis to show how the strategic
      incentives of Athenian institutional design, along with a strong societal consen-
      sus on the value of constitutional democracy, were necessary ingredients for
      dispelling both threats. In Athens, institutions responsive to citizens' demands
      existed alongside a robust rule of law. This case study provides empirical evi-
      dence allowing us to reflect on the feasibility of extensive democratic input to
      the process of constitutional review. [JEL: H11-structure, scope, and perform-
      ance of government;  K40-legal  procedure, the  legal system, and illegal
      behavior (general)]

1. Introduction
     Political theory often grapples with  the tension between  democracy
     understood  as a system of government  where the ultimate sovereignty lies
     with  the people  and  the rule of law  where the people's power  is con-
     strained by a body  of laws.1 This issue dates back at least to the ancient
     Greeks,  who  produced  both  the world's first democracies and  the first
     written  law  codes  aimed  explicitly at curtailing the  rulers' power.
     Contemporary democratic nations differ   in the ways in which  they have

     *Department   of Political Economy, King's College London,  Bush  House,
     North  East Wing, 30 Aldwych,  London, WC2B   4BG,  UK.  E-mail: federica.
     carugati@kcl.ac. uk.
        1. These definitions of democracy and rule of law are deliberately shallow to capture the
     central tension between the two concepts.
     The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol. 39, No. 1
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewab033
     Advance Access Publication December 2, 2021
     © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Yale University.
     All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com