About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



113 J. Crim. L. & Crimin. Online 1 (2023)

handle is hein.journals/jclconl113 and id is 1 raw text is: 






THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY                   Vol. 113 Online
Copyright © 2023 by Sarah Turner



   WHITE-COLLAR CRIME, SENTENCING
GENDER DISPARITIES POST-BOOKER, AND
         IMPLICATIONS FOR CRIMINAL
                       SENTENCING


                                                       Sarah Turner*

      White-collar crime is an amorphous   term that has yet to be
conclusively defined since its first use in 1939. This category of criminal
activity results in what can be characterized as either economic harm or an
impediment to the government's ability to run successfully while minimizing
conflicts of interest. Sentencing of white-collar crimes came into question in
the late twentieth century due to a perception that white-collar offenders
were  receiving much lower  sentences than offenders committing more
traditional crimes. Additionally, the relationship between sentencing
outcomes and status characteristics like race, age, citizen status, and gender
were  cause for  concern. Different outcomes  based  on demographic
differences were a significant part of the impetus for sentencing reform.
     To address these disparities, the United States Sentencing Commission
(USSC) promulgated  the United States Sentencing Guidelines (Guidelines)
in 1987. The purpose of the Guidelines was to provide a comprehensive,
uniform sentencing scheme  that would minimize  nationwide sentencing
disparities. Although called Guidelines, these pre-determined sentencing
ranges were mandatory until 2005, when the Supreme Court deemed them
merely advisory in United States v. Booker. The resumption of judicial
discretion has potentially opened the door to new trends in sentencing
disparities. This Comment will focus on analyzing the data provided by the
USSC  to determine if there has been a gender-based disparity in sentencing
since 2005, and, if so, why. Historically, when criminally convicted, women
have been sentenced much more  leniently than men. The rise of women in
corporate management  positions seems to lend itself to the idea that there
should be a rising number of women participating in and being sentenced for



   * J.D. candidate, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, Class of 2023. Many thanks to
Professor Jonathan Koehler for his invaluable assistance.


1