About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



51 Indus. L.J. 1 (2022)

handle is hein.journals/indlj51 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Industrial Law Journal, Vol. 51, No. 1, March 2022 © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwac002




Should 'Gender Critical' Views about Trans


People Be Protected as Philosophical Beliefs


in  the   Workplace? Lessons for the Future from


Forstater, Mackereth and Higgs



SHARON  COWAN*   AND SEAN  MORRIS**

Acceptance Date February 14, 2022; Advanced Access publication on February 25, 2022.



ABSTRACT

Some  Employment   Tribunal claims brought under  the Equality Act 2010 (EqA)
involve situations where a person's protection from discrimination on the grounds
of a protected characteristic-such as sex, sexual orientation or gender reassign-
ment -comes   into conflict with the rights of others, such as, for example, the right to
freedom  of expression or the right to manifest religion or belief under the European
Convention  of Human   Rights (ECHR),  or the protection from discrimination on
the ground  of religious or philosophical belief under the EqA itself. This article
provides a critical account of the application of discrimination law in the recent
cases of Forstater, Mackereth and Higgs, looking in particular at the application of
the Grainger criteria, as well as relevant human rights provisions. Specifically, we
offer an analysis of recent cases where claimants have alleged unlawful discrimin-
ation relating to 'gender critical' views about transgender people (and sex/gender
more  broadly), which they argue constitute protected religious and/or philosoph-
ical beliefs. We argue that while it is necessary that the courts maintain a flexible
approach  when  applying discrimination and human  rights law, it is vital that co-
herent equality principles are applied consistently when reconciling and balancing
conflicting rights. This is particularly important in the context of discrimination
and  human  rights, where there is an ongoing debate about the extent to which
trans peoples' rights are adequately protected and whether protecting such rights
infringes the rights of others.



  *University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, email: s.cowan@ed.ac.uk;
  *Independent researcher, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, email: helloseanmorris@hotmail.
com. The authors would like to thank the journal editor and the anonymous reviewers for


1