About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



30 Int'l J.L. & Info. Tech. 1 (2022)

handle is hein.journals/ijlit30 and id is 1 raw text is: 
International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 2022, 30, 1-22
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaacOO6
Advance Access Publication Date: 24 March 2022
Article






   Pretrial risk assessment instruments in the US

   criminal justice system-what lessons can be

               learned for the European Union

   Ante  Novokmet        *, Zvonimir   Tomici6       t and  Zoran  Vinkovid      *


                                    ABSTRACT
   This  article explores the possibilities of using artificial intelligence (AI) in the
   European  judicial area with a special emphasis on risk assessment instruments and
   the justification of their use in determining the likelihood that a defendant at large
   will seek to thwart the goal of criminal proceedings. In this regard, experiences in
   the application of various risk assessment instruments in US judicial practice are
   first analysed. Then the European normative framework  established at the level of
   the Council of Europe  and European  Union  (EU)  law is considered with special
   emphasis  on the 'Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the
   Council laying down  harmonized  rules on artificial intelligence' as a key normative
   act that will determine the long-term preconditions for the application of the risk
   assessment instruments in the criminal proceedings of EU Member  States. Finally,
   an attempt is made to give answers to some specific questions that arose from the
   implementation  of Al in EU criminal justice systems taking into account the pre-
   sumption  of innocence, the right to an objective and impartial judge and the prin-
   ciple of proportionality.
   KEYWORDS: artificial intelligence, risk assessment instruments, criminal proceedings,
   pretrial detention, fair trial, EU law


                                INTRODUCTION
One   of the most  sensitive tasks that law enforcement   bodies  face in their daily
work  is certainly the  question  of the justification of depriving  a defendant   of
personal   liberty  for  the  purpose of initiating and conducting criminal


* Associate Professor, Faculty of Law Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia.
  E-mail: ante.novokmetcpravos.hr
  t Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia.
  E-mail: zvonimir.tomicicapravos.hr
  * Deputy of the Municipal State Attorney, Municipal State Attorney's Office, Cakovec, Croatia. E-mail: zoran.
  vinkovic@odock.dorh.hr
  This article is a product of work that has been fully supported by the Faculty of Law Osijek Josip Juraj
  Strossmayer University of Osijek under the project nr. IP-PRAVOS-18 'Artificial intelligence and criminal
  law'.


© The Author(s) (2022). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
For permissions, please email: journals.permissionspoup.com.


.  1