About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



110 Minn. L. Rev. Headnotes 1 (2025-2026)

handle is hein.journals/headnotpan110 and id is 1 raw text is: 









Essay


Exceptional Cases

Emily  Caublet

                     INTRODUCTION
    In their recent book, AUTOMATED AGENCIES, Professors
Blank  and Osofsky offer what the book front matter aptly de-
scribes as the definitive account of how automation is trans-
forming government  explanations of law to the public.1 As they
lay out in detail, for many decades the private sector has used
automated  systems to provide customer service, and government
agencies have done the same by developing and making availa-
ble various online tools to provide the public with guidance on
applicable law. As they note, sometimes automated tools offer
guidance that does not align with actual law. One example they
describe entails the IRS's automated tool informing a hypothet-
ical user that they are not entitled to a medical expense deduc-
tion for the cost of a home health aide, an arguably incorrect an-
swer given the user's unique circumstances. As Professors Blank
and Osofsky speculate, in that case, the IRS's automated tool's
answer likely reflects the IRS's decision that the automated le-
gal guidance system should offer responses that are correct for
most taxpayers, even at the cost of offering incorrect responses
for some.2 This theme-that automated guidance does not deal
well with exceptional cases-is one theme upon which I will elab-
orate in this Essay.
    As Professors Blank and Osofsky  explain in the book and
have  explained in their prior work, informal guidance often

    t Thomas G. Ragatz Chair in Tax Law, University of Wisconsin Law
School. The author would like to thank Anuj Desai and Larry Zelenak for their
helpful comments. The author would also like to thank the editors of Minnesota
Law ReviewHeadnotes for their helpful comments and edits. Copyright © 2025
by Emily Cauble.
   1. JOSHUA D. BLANK & LEIGH OSOFSKY, AUTOMATED AGENCIES: THE
TRANSFORMATION OF GOVERNMENT GUIDANCE (Cambridge University Press
2025).
   2. BLANK & OSOFSKY, supra note 1, at 8.


1