About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



58 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 1 (2026)

handle is hein.journals/gwilr58 and id is 1 raw text is: 









   CORPORATE GENDER WASHING AND WOMEN'S RIGHTS:
                          A CALL   FOR   HARD LAW APPROACHES

                                                       DR. YING  CHEN*
                                                 DR. ROSIE  WALTERS**


      The twenty-first century has seen a surge in corporations portraying
   themselves as champions of gender equality. Some of the world's largest
   corporations seek to persuade publics of their commitment to furthering
   the feminist cause by sponsoring women's and girls' non-governmental
   organizations, setting up women's empowerment networks for their em-
   ployees, or investing in women-led businesses. Yet many of these same
   corporations still face accusations of gendered human rights abuses
   in their employment practices and across their global business opera-
   tions. A small but growing  body of academic literature across disci-
   plines has sought to define and identify corporate practices of gender
   washing,  a relatively recent term used to describe instances in which
   corporations engage in misleading corporate social responsibility (CSR)
   practices to give the impression that they are more gender equal or
   woman-friendly  than they really are. However; to date, there has been
   little analysis from a legal perspective. Current CSR practices are pre-
   dominantly  exercised through voluntary self-regulation, with limited
   meaningful  implementation, as corporations are not legally obligated
   to address their adverse human rights impacts or violations. Further-
   more, while the United Nations Guiding Principles and the Organiza-
   tion for Economic Co-operation and Development  (OECD)  guidelines
   exist to regulate corporate behavior; they remain ineffective as soft law
   mechanisms  because they fail to impose legal liability for non-compli-
   ance.  The existing mechanisms are flawed, and there is a need for a
   hard law approach to addressing corporate violations of women's rights
   and  gender washing.  Our analysis highlights the need for mandatory
   reporting and mandatory   human   rights due diligence, reinforced by
   effective liability mechanisms, to ensure corporate accountability and
   justice for victims of gendered human rights abuses.


   *   Dr. Ying Chen, Associate Professor, Bond University Faculty of Law, Gold Coast,
Australia. The author may be reached at yinchen@bond.edu.au.
   **  Dr Rosie Walters, Senior Lecturer in International Relations, Cardiff University
School of Law and Politics, Cardiff, U.K. The author may be reached at waltersR13@cardiff.
ac.uk.


1