About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



7 Governance: An Int'l J. Pol'y, Admin, & Institutions 1 (1994)

handle is hein.journals/gvnanlj7 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Purchasing Policy Advice:
The Limits to Contracting Out

JONATHAN BOSTON*


  Throughout  the OECD,  governments have been contracting out an increas-
  ing  range of goods and  services. Against this background, this article
  outlines the case for, and assesses the merits of, placing the purchase of
  governmental  policy advice on a more competitive basis. Two options are
  given  particular attention: first, the creation of an internal market for
  policy advice within the public sector under which departments and other
  government  agencies would tender to supply specific policy outputs; and
  second, a more radical option under which public and private sector orga-
  nizations would compete for the contracts to supply governmental policy
  advice. Drawing  on the insights of the new institutional economics, it is
  argued  that neither option is likely to enhance the efficiency or effectiveness
  with which  policy advice is produced, whether under conditions of short-
  term or long-term contracting. This is due to the likelihood of: only partial
  contestability (due, among other things, to asset specificity in the form of
  transaction-specific expertise and trust); a greater risk of opportunistic
  behavior by the suppliers of advice (and also, under some conditions, by
  the purchasers); higher agency costs and transaction costs; and greater
  problems with respect to horizontal and vertical policy coordination. Such
  considerations suggest that the widespread reliance of governments on
  relatively permanent advisory institutions and in-house expertise can be
  explained and justified on the same theoretical grounds that have prompted
  the contracting out of other publicly-funded goods and services.

Since  the early 1980s policymakers  in many  countries have been  signif-
icantly influenced  by  what  Hood   (1990) has  called the new   public
management and by various economics-based approaches to admin-
istrative analysis. This has  led to the privatization of many  publicly-
owned enterprises, the contracting out of numerous publicly-funded
goods  and  services, a growing reliance on short-term employment con-
tracts and performance-based   pay, and  a move  away from  the provision
of public services by a single provider in favor of competitive, multiple-
provider  structures (Hood  1987; Kettl 1988a; 1988b; Pollitt 1990; Rimmer
* Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration. Vol. 7, No. 1, January 1994
(pp. 1-30). © 1994 Blackwell Publishers, 238 Main Street, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA,
and 108 Cowley Road, Oxford, OX4 IJF, UK. ISSN 0952-1895