About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



60 Ga. L. Rev. 1 (2025)

handle is hein.journals/geolr60 and id is 1 raw text is: 









GAMESMANSHIP IN CIVIL LITIGATION

  Edith Beerdsen*

     In civil litigation, strategy is everywhere.  Some  of  it is
  explicitly envisioned by rules of procedure, but other forms of
  strategy rely more on  clever exploitation of gaps in the rules,
  sometimes   through  trickery, surprise, or psychological mind
  games.   The   role  strategy  plays   in  civil  litigation is
  underexamined,   which  raises two  concerns: first, this lack of
  attention entrenches strategy by default as a procedural  value
  in competition with  accuracy, efficiency, and other procedural
  values. Second,  it amplifies the disadvantages experienced  by
  unrepresented  litigants. This Article builds on earlier work to
  examine  how   courts shape  the space  that litigants have for
  strategic behavior, in service of an inquiry into how that space
  ought to be shaped.
     Battles over the meaning   and  rightful place of strategy in
  civil litigation tend to play out in the arena of gamesmanship,
  a term courts use with increasing frequency to refer to behavior
  in the gray zone  between  the clearly allowed and  the clearly
  disallowed.   Strategic  behavior   in  this  realm   is  often
  unregulated   by rules, only weakly  governed   by norms,  and
  subject to significant judicial discretion. Judicial decisions in
  cases  involving  gamesmanship frequently expose tensions
  between   respect for zealous  advocacy   and  concerns  about
  fairness and accuracy.



  * Associate Professor of Law, Temple University, James E. Beasley School of Law. I am
grateful for comments and from to Gilat Bachar, Jane Baron, Rachel Bayefsky, Jeffrey
Dunoff, Nate Ela, Richard Friedman, Alex Gouzoules, Craig Green, Paul Gugliuzza, J. Benton
Heath, Helen Hershkoff, Brian Hutler, Chris Jaeger, Dan Lewerenz, Tom Lin, Meghan
Morris, Julie Randolph, Dorit Reiss, Matthew Shapiro, Chris Upton, Harwell Wells, and
participants at internal workshops at Temple Law School, the AALS Jurisprudence
Workshop, the Maryland Law School's Legal Theory Workshop, and the Ninth Civil
Procedure Workshop. Many thanks to the editing team at the Georgia Law Review, especially
Trudi Sundberg, Eric Narbo, and John Douglas Kirby, for superb editing.


1