About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


17 Eur. J. on Crim. Pol'y & Rsch. 1 (2011)

handle is hein.journals/eurjcpr17 and id is 1 raw text is: Eur J Crim Policy Res (2011) 17:1-5 DOI 10.1007/s10610-010-9137-4 Guest Editor's Introduction Paul Ekblom Published online: 14 December 2010 O Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) is a familiar field of practice, particularly in English-speaking and Northern European nations, but now emerging too in countries such as Italy and France which have traditionally followed more community- and offender-oriented paths in crime prevention; and in Eastern Europe, Turkey and the Middle East. Although worthy of support, CPTED does have some serious limitations, which may limit its theoretical and empirical sharpness, practical relevance and its lasting adoption; and may even introduce harmful side-effects. So 'old hands' and 'new hands' alike need to proceed with some caution. The idea behind this thematic issue of EJCPR is to support the concept of CPTED, and to respect the practical experience that has built up over the years, but to subject the language, the methodology, the theory, the detailed evidence and the working practice to constructive criticism. The intention, too, is to indicate directions in which CPTED should update and evolve as a practical but rigorous and evidence-based discipline. (Evidence of impact on crime of CPTED programmes is not covered here although equally important to the future of the approach.) In this introduction I will very briefly define and describe the basic principles of CPTED, as they are now; identify some of the main problems and limitations of CPTED; suggest some strategic ways in which CPTED and its component concepts could evolve and improve; look ahead to the papers in this issue which take things forward in quite diverse ways; and finish with a proposed redefinition of CPTED. Ideally the debate will not stop with this issue but continue elsewhere, contributing to a much-needed reinvigoration of the field. P. Ekblom (E) Design Against Crime Research Centre, Central Saint Martins College of Art and Design, University of the Arts London, Southampton Row, London WC1B 4AP, UK e-mail: p.ekblom@csm.arts.ac.uk 4_ Springer