About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



2 Eur. J. Sec. Rsch. 1 (2017)

handle is hein.journals/eupnjfos2 and id is 1 raw text is: 

Eur J Secur Res (2017) 2:1-3                                             CrossMark
DOI 10.1007/s41125-017-0014-8
I  )Q  >RA LAi


Editorial


Stefan Hiermaierl








Published online: 7 March 2017
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017


Terrorist attacks, natural disasters, catastrophic technical failures and human errors:
these are  a variety of so-called disruptive events  that are harmful  to vital
components   of societies and can  be lethal to more  or less randomly   affected
individuals. For society to avoid the effects of disruptive events, to reduce their
impact  if and when  they occur and  to recover as quickly as possible, a holistic
approach  seems inevitable. Protective technologies, data acquisition and processing
for precise situation awareness, governance and control in the immediate reaction
phase as well as legal conformity and societal acceptance are all part of a requisite
integrated solution.
   The  articles published in this issue of  the European   Journal for  Security
Research  present ideas and possible solutions in response to this complex multi-
disciplinary challenge. The broad spectrum of several recent incidents illustrates the
respective dimensions involved: A  catastrophic accident involving two commuter
trains in Bad Aibling, Germany   in February 2016.  The  small town of  Simbach,
Germany   witnessed a deadly flooding in June. In July a terrorist killed more than 80
people in Nice, France and another one injured 15 people in a suicide bombing  in
Ansbach,  Germany.  Hurricane Matthew  hit the Caribbean in September. In October,
a fatal explosion at a BASF chemical facility killed several people. A Tsunami hit
New  Zealand in November.  And  in December, yet another terrorist abused a truck to
commit  a fatal attack on a Christmas market in Berlin. Some of these events were
known,  yet could not be prevented, some were unexpected. Some   can also be seen
ex post as examples of positive security measures: successful preparation, protection
and recovery. Finally, some probably caused  more damage  than necessary.



®  Stefan Hiermaier
    stefan.hiermaier@inatech.uni-freiburg.de

    Department of Sustainable Systems Engineering (INATECH), Albert-Ludwigs University,
    Freiburg, Emmy-Noether-StraBe 2, 79110 Freiburg, Germany


Springer