About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



52 Env't L. [i] (2022)

handle is hein.journals/envlnw52 and id is 1 raw text is: ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
Lewis & Clark Law School

VOLUME 52                    WINTER 2022                    NUMBER 1
ARTICLES
How to Choose Between Environmentally Positive Actions When
One of Those Actions Can Harm the Other: A Case Study of
the Conflict Between the California Condor and Wind
T u rbin es......................................................................................  1
Hope Babcock
This Article looks at the potential conflict between restoring
endangered condors to the wild and installing wind turbines, an
increasingly important source of renewable energy. The ideal terrain
for each is the same as both are dependent on wind and require some
degree of isolation from people. Yet, they cannot coexist in the same
space without harm occurring to any condor that transects the sweep
of a turbine's blades.
This Article explores various approaches to resolving conflicts
involving incommensurable choices. The author rejects approaches
that rest on commonsense norms, like first come, first served, moral
principles, or on political realities because they are ambiguous and
contestable. Nor does the author find it helpful to compare the
durability of a choice, the breadth of its public support, or the
severity of the consequences of a wrong decision, as the choices
become indistinguishable.
This Article concludes that the ease of replacing a use should be the
dominant factor. Here, the irreplaceability of the condor means that it
should prevail in any conflict with wind turbines as there are other
equally viable sources of renewable energy. However, steps must be
taken to lessen the negative impact of protecting condors on the
growth of the wind turbine industry to be sure it continues to grow.
One way to do that is to implement positive initiatives to offset
harms to the losing side
The Nondelegation Cliffhanger: Implications of the Potential
Doctrinal Shift on Environmental Law and the Role of
Environmental Advocacy   ...........................................................  25
Frederick A. McDonald