What Is HeinOnline?
HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.
Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?
Log In
![handle is hein.journals/duljo66 and id is 1 raw text is:
Duke Law Journal Online
VOLUME 66 NOVEMBER 2016
DETERMINING CLASSIFIED EVIDENCE'S
PRIMARY PURPOSE: THE
CONFRONTATION CLAUSE AND CLASSIFIED
INFORMATION AFTER OHIO V. CLARK
J. PETER LETTENEYt
INTRODUCTION
Evidence derived from classified national-security information
has long been a part of court proceedings in the United States.' Despite
the longstanding nature of its use, it can pose constitutional issues. The
Sixth Amendment to the Constitution requires that [i]n all criminal
prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right.., to be confronted
with the witnesses against him .. .2 The Supreme Court's post-
Crawford v. Washington3 interpretation of the Confrontation Clause,
including its most recent clarification in Ohio v. Clark,4 presents a
theoretical obstacle to introducing such evidence in criminal trials.
Before Crawford, prosecutors were required to show only indicia of
reliability to support the introduction of evidence over a
Copyright © 2016 J. Peter Letteney.
t Duke University School of Law, J.D. 2016; University of Pennsylvania, M.S.Ed 2009;
University of Delaware, B.A. 2008. I would like to thank Professor Christopher Schroeder for his
help and advice during the preparation of this Note. Also, thank you to the members of the Duke
Law Journal for their hard work.
1. See, e.g., S. REP. No. 110-442, pt. 1, at 2 (2008) (stating that the Supreme Court first
addressed the use of the state secrets privilege -which allows the Federal Government to prevent
the disclosure of information which would be harmful to the United States-in United States v.
Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953)); Note, Secret Evidence in the War on Terror, 118 HARV. L. REV.
1962, 1962 (2005) ([T]he United States has long used [classified] evidence in criminal
prosecutions, military courts-martial and various immigration proceedings.).
2. U.S. CONST. amend. VI.
3. Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004).
4. Ohio v. Clark, 135 S. Ct 2173 (2015).](ViewImageLocal?handle=hein.journals/duljo66&div=1&collection=&method=preview&ext=.png&size=3)