About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


80 Def. Counsel J. 1 (2013)

handle is hein.journals/defcon80 and id is 1 raw text is: January 2013 Volume 80, No. 1 Pages 1-112 International Association of Defense Counsel 303 West Madison Suite 925 Chicago, IL 60606 USA Telephone: 312.368.1494 Fax: 312.368.1854 E-mail: info@iadclaw.org Web site: http://www.iadclaw.org In this issue... ANNOUNCEMENTS AND DEPARTMENTS Table of Contents........................................................... 1 President's Page.. ...........................................................3 IADC Tenets of Professionalism...............................................5 IAD C O fficers and Board of Directors.......... ..........................................7 Defense Counsel Journal Board and Committee Vice Chairs...........................8 Calendar of Meetings........................................................10 Conning the Newsletters......................... ......................... .....90 FEATURED ARTICLES WILL THE REAL INTENDED THIRD-PARTY PLEASE STAND UP?................................................11 By: Paul C Peterson and Ryan P Myers Considering legal doctrines that have been found to provide non-clients with standing to sue an attorney. IN UNITY THERE IS STRENGTH: THE ADVANTAGES (AND DISADVANTAGES) OF JOINT DEFENSE GROUPS. ........... ............29 By: Bradley C Nahrstadt and W Brandon Rogers Discussing the advantages associated with forming a joint defense group, identifying possible risks associated with a joint defense group, and discussing preservation of joint defense privilege. THE EMERGING BATTLEFIELD: SHOULD THE USE OF A NONMONOTONIC, NON-THRESHOLD DOSE-RESPONSE CURVE FOR ALLEGED ENDOCRINE-DISRUPTING CHEMICALS SURVIVE A DAUBERT/PRYE CHALLENGE ........... .............45 By: Mark C Surprenant and Diana Cole Surprenant Demonstrating how-to construct a successful Daubert/Frye challenge against an expert's attempted use of a nonmonotonic, non-threshold dose-response curve to support an adverse causation opinion.