About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



27 Colum. Sci. & Tech. L. Rev. 1 (2026)

handle is hein.journals/cstlr27 and id is 1 raw text is: 


HIDING  IN PLAIN SIGHT


              THE COLUMBIA

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

                 LAW REVIEW


VOLUME   27                    STLR.ORG                       NUMBER  1


                              ARTICLE


  HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF
     PROSECUTORIAL BIAS IN Al LEGAL ANALYSIS


          Rory  Pulvino,*   Dan  Sutton,t  and J.J. Naddeo   I

   Artificial intelligence is beginning to shape the criminal justice system, but
scholars have largely overlooked its impact on prosecutors the system's most
powerful actors. This gap is significant because large language models are
particularly well-suited to legal work, where analysis and writing are central.
Companies  now market AI tools that prepare a first draft of potential charges
and legal memos, promising to turn 1 day of work into 1 hour. With heavy
caseloads and few guardrails, prosecutors may be quick to adopt them, and some
offices already report using AI to draft charging documents and analyze evidence.
    We conducted a large-scale experiment examining how AI might influence
prosecutorial decision-making. Using real police reports from common low-level
offenses, we asked a widely used ChatGPT model to generate over 140,000 legal
memos.  While  we anticipated signs of racial bias, we discovered a more
foundational issue: the model exhibits aprosecutorial default bias. It systematically
recommends  prosecution-even when  prompted  from  a defense perspective,
confronted with  minimal evidence, or presented with  clear constitutional
violations.
    These findings raise urgent questions about the integration of AI into legal
workflows. We explore the role of automation bias the pattern, even among highly
trained professionals, to defer to algorithmic suggestions and how it may anchor
human  decision-making toward harsher outcomes. We also examine how systems


    * Rory Pulvino is the Chief Implementation Officer at the Justice Innovation Lab. We are
grateful to Lily Grier for technical help and to Jesse Rothman for helpful comments.
    t Dan Sutton is the Director of Justice and Safety, Stanford Center for Racial Justice at
 Stanford Law School.
     J.J. Naddeo is the Research Coordinator at the University of Michigan Law School.


2026 ]


1