About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



59 Crime L. & Soc. Change 1 (2013)

handle is hein.journals/crmlsc59 and id is 1 raw text is: Crime Law Soc Change (2013) 59:1-20
DOI 10.1007/s10611-012-9396-8
Involvement mechanisms for organized crime
M. Vere van Koppen
Published online: 25 October 2012
O Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012
Abstract This study aims to illuminate the processes that make individuals engage in
organized crime activities. Within the diversity of individual involvement processes,
several distinctive mechanisms are discussed. Theoretical ideas are illustrated by
empirical data on 15 crime groups, including over 300 offenders. The crime groups
differ in size, composition, and the nature of criminal activities. Social capital theory
is used to understand the dynamical process of becoming involved in organized
crime; on the one hand an individual contributes to a crime group, on the other hand
the crime group helps an individual reach certain goals. Case studies reveal several
resources, such as knowledge, skills, and equipment, that make offenders suit and
contribute to a particular organized crime group. Criminal and conventional histories
of organized crime offenders turn out to be diverse. Several joint characteristics that
opened doors to organized crime opportunities, like running one's own business, are
discussed. It is confirmed that involvement through family and long-time friends is
common; most criminal groups contain at least one or two relatives.
The question why individuals engage in crime is at the heart of the criminological
enterprise. As stated by Wikstrdm [47: 5]: To explain crime is to answer the question
The data used in this paper are part of a continuing research project, the Organized Crime Monitor. I am
grateful to the members of the Organized Crime Monitor research group, particularly Ruud Kouwenberg
and Mait6 van Nassou. Special thanks go to Christianne de Poot, Edward Kleemans, Arjan Blokland, and
the reviewers for their valuable comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
M. V. van Koppen
Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), Amsterdam,
The Netherlands
M. V. van Koppen
Research and Documentation Centre (WODC), Dutch Ministry of Security and Justice, The Hague,
The Netherlands
M. V. van Koppen (E)
Faculty of Law, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam,
The Netherlands
e-mail: mv.van.koppen@vu.nl

4L Springer