About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



11 Criminology & Crim. Just. 3 (2011)

handle is hein.journals/crmcj11 and id is 1 raw text is: 







Article

                                                                Criminology & Criminal justice
                                                                              I 1(1) 3-19
                                                                      @ The Author(s) 201 I
                                                              Reprints and permission:sagepub.
im   portance         of   qualitative                           c~l/orasemsin~a
                                                                 co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
                                                              DOI: 10.1 177/1748895810392188
approaches in evaluating                                                  cisgpbcr
                                                                          crj.sagepub.com
work with women offenders




Carol Hedderman
University of Leicester, UK


Clare   Gunby
Liverpool John Moores University, UK


Nicola Shelton
University of Leicester, UK


Abstract
In 2004 the Government in England and Wales published a new policy on responding to women
who  offend. The aims were to reduce women's involvement in crime and to divert them from
prison. The 'Together Women' project was funded under this policy initiative to demonstrate
how  services for women offenders should be provided in the community. The first stage of the
associated evaluation included interviews with Together Women's clients as their feedback was
seen as important in helping to develop effective services and as an early indicator of impact.
However, the final assessment of impact relies on a quantitative assessment based on project files
and criminal records data. The only interviews to be conducted will focus on asking sentencers
about whether they use Together Women to divert women from custody.
  This article draws on interviews conducted with Together Women clients in the project's
development  phase to argue that outcome evaluations which rely exclusively or mainly on
information in project databases and criminal records may not capture key elements which make
an intervention 'work'. Neglecting service users' insights may lead to under-estimating resource
needs, unrealistic target setting, and the eventual abandonment of promising ideas in favour of
the next'new' magic bullet.


Keywords
desistance, methods, outcome evaluation, women offenders


Corresponding author:
Carol Hedderman, Department of Criminology, University of Leicester, 154 New Walk, Leicester, LE I 7QA, UK
email: ch 140@le.ac.uk