About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



35 Crim. L.F. 1 (2024)

handle is hein.journals/crimlfm35 and id is 1 raw text is: 




Criminal Law Forum (2024) 35:1-37                         © The Author(s) 2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-023-09476-6

          DIRK  VAN  ZYL  SMIT*     and CHRISTOPHER SEEDS



       EXTRADITION AND WHOLE LIFE SENTENCES

         Accepted: 28 October 2023; Published online: 12 December 2023


ABSTRACT. Sentences  of life imprisonment without a prospect of adequate review
and release are prohibited in States party to the European Convention on Human
Rights. Should the same principle apply when extradition is sought to States not
party to the Convention? In Sanchez Sanchez v United Kingdom (2022), the Grand
Chamber  of the European Court of Human Rights applied a less strict standard for
potential extraditees facing life without parole. We analyse this decision and its
repercussions in light of the history of international cooperation in extreme pun-
ishment cases between Europe and the USA and recent interpretations of the new
standard. The article concludes with an assessment of the level of proof litigants must
present to satisfy the Sanchez Sanchez test and of how the law could continue to
prevent inhuman and degrading treatment of extraditees facing life sentences.



                        I  INTRODUCTION

In  all but 33  countries in  the world,  the State  has the  power   to
imprison  persons   until they die, and  this power   is regarded  as  a
legitimate means   of punishing  serious crimes.1 In Europe,  however,
the law has increasingly recognised  that if such an exercise of power is
untrammelled,   it is open to abuse. Accordingly,  the European   Court
of Human Rights (ECtHR) holds that prisoners serving life sen-
tences, while enjoying  no  right to release, must nevertheless  have  a
prospect  of  release coupled  with  a  clear process  for determining
whether  penological  justifications support continued   imprisonment.
Failure  to meet   these requirements,   the  Grand   Chamber of the

  * Dirk van Zyl Smit, Emeritus Professor of Comparative and International Penal
Law,  University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.  E-mail: dirk.vanzylsmit@
uct.ac..za. Dirk van Zyl Smit, Emeritus Professor of Criminology and Senior Re-
search Scholar, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.Dirk van Zyl
Smit gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the Leverhulme Trust, which
granted him a Leverhulme emeritus fellowship (EM-2021-034) in 2021-2023, and of
the South African National Research Foundation (Grant 150054). ** Christopher
Seeds, Department of Criminology, Law & Society, University of California, Irvine,
Irvine, CA, USA. E-mail: cseeds@uci.edu.
   D  van Zyl Smit and C Appleton, Life Imprisonment a Global Human Rights
Analysis (Harvard University Press 2019), xiii.