About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



16 Crim. L.F. 1 (2005)

handle is hein.journals/crimlfm16 and id is 1 raw text is: Criminal Law Forum (2005) 16: 1-31                    © Springer 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10609-005-2231-5
CARSTEN STAHN*
MODIFICATION OF THE LEGAL CHARACTERIZATION OF
FACTS IN THE ICC SYSTEM: A PORTRAYAL OF
REGULATION 55
I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free
Michelangelo
According to a popular historical anecdote, Michelangelo used a
piece of marble that other sculptors rejected to create his famous
statue of David. When a boy came by and asked him why he was
working so hard on the stone, Michelangelo replied Young boy, I
saw an angel deep at rest within the marble, waiting to be set free to
inspire Florence - and the world.
The relationship between the concept of the legal characterization
of facts1 and the ICC Statute is similar to Michelangelo's imagery of
the angel in marble. The contours of the principle are enshrined in
Article 74 of the Rome Statute, which distinguishes between char-
ges and facts and circumstances in the charges. The judges of the
Court have now set it out in a Regulation dealing with the authority
of the Trial Chamber to modify the legal characterization of facts
(Regulation 55).
The regulation reads:
1. In its decision under Article 74, the Trial Chamber may change the legal
characterization of facts to accord with the crimes under articles 6, 7 or
8, or to accord with the form of participation of the accused under
articles 25 and 28, without exceeding the facts and circumstances
described in the charges and any amendments to the charges.
2. If, at any time during the trial, it appears to the Chamber that the legal
characterization of facts may be subject to change, the Chamber shall
give notice to the participants of such a possibility and having heard the
evidence, shall, at an appropriate stage of the proceedings, give the
* LL.M (NYU), LL.M (K61n-Paris), Associate Legal Advisor, International
Criminal Court. The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and
do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Criminal Court.
This concept is a traditional civil law concept which allows courts to reclassify
the legal qualification of facts submitted by the parties in the course of the trial.