About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



59 Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs. 1 (2025-2026)

handle is hein.journals/collsp59 and id is 1 raw text is: 





















   Who Invited Them to the Party?:

      Using FTC UDAP Rulemaking

      Authority to Contain 'Infinite

        Privity' in Digital Consumer

                          Contracts

                          KATERINA   KAKKIS*


     In 2023, a husband lost his wife to an avoidable allergic reaction at a
   Disney restaurant in Florida. When he sought accountability for his wife's
   death, Disney asked the court to toss the case because of a binding
   arbitration clause-a clause in a contract the husband entered into when
   he signed up for a free trial of Disney+ in 2019.
     To participate in modern digital markets, consumers must enter these
   unbargained-for wrap contracts with businesses. Lurking in many such
   contracts is unassuming and obscure legalese that extends the enforceability
   of consequential contract clauses to a business' limitless affiliates,
   subsidiaries, related parties, parents, and related services. By agreeing to
   these terms, consumers give up legal leverage not only to the company on
   their screens, but also to that company's invisible corporate web. This Note
   calls this contractual sleight-of-hand the 'infinite privity'problem.
     The 'infinite privity' problem deserves attention from the key stakeholder
   in the United States' consumer protection regime the Federal Trade
   Commission.   Under  its well-established unfair practice rulemaking
   authority, the FTC should prohibit the enforcement of infinite privity when
   it unjustly strips consumers of their legal rights. The new rule would not


   *   Winner, Best Note Competition Vol. 59. Executive Articles Editor, Colum. J.L. &
Soc. Probs., 2025-2026. J.D. Candidate 2026, Columbia Law School. The author thanks
Professor Katharina Pistor for her invaluable guidance and thought-provoking
conversations that focused the Note. She thanks her peers, particularly Kushal Modi, for
their support and active engagement throughout the writing process. The author also
thanks her Note Editor, Michael Sosnick, and the staff of the Columbia Journal of Law and
Social Problems for their help preparing this Note for publication. Finally, the author
thanks Abe Kanter for sending her the article that inspired this Note and encouraging her
to write about it.