About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



59 U. Mich. J. L. Reform Caveat 1 (2026)

handle is hein.journals/caveat59 and id is 1 raw text is: 

University ofMichigan  Journal ofLaw  Reform  Caveat


             SUBSIDIARITY   MUNICIPALISM IN ACTION: ON VINCENT V. ADAMS
                                  GREGORY E. LOUIS*

                                          ABSTRACT

Building on  the author's recent article Protecting Commoners'   Goods:  Pluralist Coexistence
Through   the Common Good Constitution's Subsidiarity Municipalism (PCG), this Essay
deconstructs the recent New York appellate opinion in Vincent v. Adams. That case reverses a trial
court opinion that PCG  criticizes as an example of how current law misunderstands  the proper
relationship between  local government  and federal and  state authorities. This Essay uses the
appellate  court decision  in Vincent  v. Adams to reinforce PCG's thesis of subsidiarity
municipalism,  to offer another illustration of subsidiarity municipalism's progressive potential,
and to suggest how subsidiarity municipalism can inform the relationship between state and local
bodies on budgetary questions.


                                      I.     INTRODUCTION

The following Essay uses a recent New York appellate decision about a local housing subsidy law'
as a vehicle for promoting the thesis of my recent article Protecting Commoners'Goods (PCG).2
The  New  York Appellate  Division, First Department's unanimous  opinion in Vincent v. Adams
reverses a trial court decision that PCG criticizes as an example of how the law misunderstands
the proper  relationship between local government   and federal and  state authorities.3 As law
professor rantings seldom  receive immediate real-world validation, I must seize this fortuitous
opportunity to further PCG's  argument of subsidiarity municipalism's progressive possibilities.
This Essay does so in three additional sections.

Section II sets the stage of the appeal, identifying its aspects most relevant to my recent Article
and its theory. Section III explains, in three subparts, how the New York Appellate Division, First
Department's  opinion  furthers subsidiarity municipalism. Subpart A  provides  a summary   of
subsidiarity municipalism, which PCG frames as the constitutionalism produced when the classical
legal tradition's principle of subsidiarity is applied to the U.S. constitutional structure. In a nutshell,
subsidiarity municipalism contends that the application of the classical legal tradition to resolve
constitutional disputes results in the empowerment of local government to broadly exercise power

* Associate Professor of Law, CUNY School of Law. J.D., Fordham University School of Law, 2009 (David F. and
Mary Louise Condon Prize in American Legal History); B.A., Columbia University, 2006. This Essay is dedicated
to my friends, partners, and mentors Asher Freeman and Kristina Naplatarski for their continuing insight into the
function of municipal government and its special role in, and aptitude for, delivering services to the most vulnerable
populations. I also thank Allyson Russell, Dariush Ahdoot, and the entire Journal ofLaw Reform team for their patient,
tireless, and superlative development, enhancement, and sharpening of the Essay's argument.
1 Vincent v. Adams, 239 N.Y.S.3d 130 (App. Div. 1st Dep't 2025).
2 Gregory E. Louis, Protecting Commoners' Goods: Pluralist Coexistence Through the Common Good
Constitution's SubsidiarityMunicipalism, 15 BR. J. AM. LEG. STUD. 21 (2025).
3Id. at 44. As Vincent also illustrates, these conflicts are typically litigated under the label of preemption. See Vincent,
239 N.Y.S.3d at 134.


l


[VOL. 59 ]