About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



98 Can. B. Rev. 1 (2020)

handle is hein.journals/canbarev98 and id is 1 raw text is: 










Vol. 98                        2020                           No. 1



A   COMPARATIVE LOOK AT VICARIOUS LIABILITY
   FOR INTENTIONAL WRONGS AND ABUSES OF
                POWER IN CANADIAN LAW

                       Nikolas  De Stefano*


This paper examines  the theoretical underpinnings of vicarious liability
in the Canadian common  law as well as in Quebec's civil law tradition. It
then goes on to trace how each legal tradition has responded to employees'
intentional wrongdoing. More specifically, the paper analyses the scope of
employment  in cases of fraud, theft and sexual violence. The paper then
identifies a developing trend in Quebec's law through which judges adopt
the approach of the common law in an attempt to find liability where the
traditional civilian test is of no use. Ultimately, a comparison between the
civilian approach and the common law approach is made. This paper argues
that the common law approach is more responsive to the policies justifying
the institution of vicarious liability and that Quebec courts should be more
willing to adopt this.


Cet article discute des assises theoriques de la responsabilite du fait d'autrui
en common  law canadienne ainsi que dans la tradition civiliste du Quebec.
L'auteur retrace ensuite la maniere dont chacune des traditions juridiques a
traite l'inconduite deliberee de la part des employes, en centrant son analyse
sur  l'exercice desfonctions en cas defraude, de vol et d'agressions sexuelles.
L'auteur de l'article souligne qu'en droit quebecois, les tribunaux ont de plus
en plus tendance a adopter l'approche de la common law pour tenter de

        BCL/JD McGill University, Law Clerk at the Supreme Court of Canada for
Justice Rosalie Abella in 2020-21, and student-at-law at IMK LLP. The author would like
to thank Shauna Van Praagh for her thoughtful comments for their discussions throughout
the drafting process. The author would also like to thank the anonymous editors at the
CBR for their invaluable feedback.


THE  CANADIAN BAR REVIEW

   LA REVUE   DU  BARREAU
          CANADIEN