About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


63 U. Louisville L. Rev. 1 (2024-2025)

handle is hein.journals/branlaj63 and id is 1 raw text is: THEISTIC ILLIBERAL CONSTITUTIONALISM: A REVIEW OF ADRIAN VERMEULE'S COMMON GOOD CONSTITUTIONALISM Kyron Huigens* Adrian Vermeule's Common Good Constitutionalism drew a remarkable amount ofattentionfrom constitutional law scholars when it was published in 2020. About eighteen months later, Vermeule published a piece complaining that the critics had missed the point, that they had ignored the natural law jurisprudence that grounds the work. He was correct. This Review addresses Vermeule's natural law jurisprudence, emphasizing the fact that it is a religious natural law jurisprudence. His arguments are in the tradition of Scholasticism- Aristotelian logic incorporated into Christian theology by St. Thomas Aquinas. Scholasticism is a remarkably weak foundation for constitutionaljurisprudence. It is a vast system ofintuitions, essences, definitions, and deductions from reason instead of inferences from empirical observation. The consequences of introducing thirteenth- century metaphysics and epistemology into twenty-first-century law and legal theory are, predictably, catastrophic. When combined with Vermeule's earlier work on the concentration of power in the presidency and the administrative agencies, the outlines of a constitutional theocracy are visible. CONTENTS IN TR O D U C T IO N .................................................................................................. 2 I. THE COMMON GOOD AND DEVELOPING CONSTITUTIONALISM ...... 8 A . Sup ernaturalism .......................................................................... . 8 B . S ch o la sticism ....................................................................................1 1 C. The Constitution ofProvidence.................................................. 18 D . Scholastic Illiberalism ................................................................ . 23 E . Satan & B lack M ass.................................................................... . 28 F The Executive Theocrat Unbound.............................................. 32 II. C O N CLU SIO N ................................................................................ . 35 1