About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


19 Baltic J.L. & Pol. 1 (2026)

handle is hein.journals/bjlp19 and id is 1 raw text is: BALTIC JOURNAL OF LAW & POLITICS A Journal of Vytautas Magnus University VOLUME 19, ISSUE 1 (2026) ISSN 2029-0454 Cit.: Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 19: 1 (2026): 1-18 https://reference-global.com/journal/BJLP DOI: 10.2478/bjlp-2026-0001 LIMITS ON CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR PERSONS WHO HAVE ILLEGALLY CROSSED THE STATE BORDER Darius Pranka Dr. Law Institute of the Lithuanian Centre for Social Sciences, Lithuania Contact information Address: A. Gostauto g. 12, LT-01108 Vilnius, Lithuania Phone: (+370 5) 2497591 E-mail: darius.pranka@gmail.com Received: December 7, 2025; accepted: April 7, 2026 ABSTRACT The article examines the issues of interpretation and application of Article 31 of the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees of 28 July 1951 (Refugee Convention), concerning the cir- cumstances under which asylum seekers should be exempted from criminal liability. Firstly, the author examines how Lithuania and other states assess situations in which an asylum seeker enters another country by using forged or false documents. It is concluded that this matter is not properly regulated in Lithuanian criminal law, which results in the issue having to be resolved by the courts through the application of the existing legislation. The author subsequently examines the condition of without delay for the application of Article 31 of the Convention, outlining its possible interpretative meanings and illustrating them with examples of its application. Having assessed the already very different legal regulations in various countries and the extremely dif- ferent assessments of similar situations in court practice, the article argues that an internationally agreed minimum time frame falling within the scope of without delay should be established, as no such standard currently exists. Finally, the article examines the remaining conditions for im- munity from criminal liability, specifically the criteria for determining whether an asylum seeker has come directly. When assessing this requirement, the reasons and motives for an individual's stay in a transit country must be considered, as well as the factors that prompted the decision to travel to a particular state and the duration of the journey and time spent in transit states. © 2026. Darius Pranka published by Vytautas Magnus University. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. 11