About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


2026 Analele Universitatii din Bucuresti: Seria Drept 1 (2026)

handle is hein.journals/aubdrpt2026 and id is 1 raw text is: ANALELE UNIVERSITATII DIN BUCURESTI - SERIA DREPT Interventia judiciard extinsd in materia ordinului de protectie: posibilitatea dispunerii din oficiu a mysurilor de protectie si suplinirea consimtamyntului victimei pentru purtarea dispozitivului electronic de supraveghere Drd. Maria-Giovanna Rossi Facultatea de Drept, Universitatea din Bucuresti Rezumat: Ca urmare a cresterii in Rom6nia cazurilor de violent6 domestic6 si violentd in familie, prezentul articol isi propune s6 analizeze, pe de o parte, cadrul general Fin materia ordinelor de protectie prin raportare la limitarea interventiei instantei cu privire la dispunerea mysurilor de protectie f6r6 ca acestea s6 fie solicitate de cutre victim6 si, Fin special, posibilitatea suplinirii consimtumontului victimei de a purta dispozitivul electronic de supraveghere si, implicit, de a-ifi montat6 agresorului br6tar6 electronic6 de supraveghere Fin cazul constat6rii de cutre instantd a existentei unui pericol real si iminent asupra vietii acesteia. Cuvinte cheie: ordin de protectie, violenta in familie, violenta domestic6, victim6, agresor, dispozitiv electronic de supraveghere. Enhanced judicial intervention in the field of restraining orders: the court's power to order protective measures ex officio and to substitute the victim's consent for the imposition of an electronic monitoring device Abstract: The steady increase in cases in Romania of domestic andfamily violence has prompted renewed attention to the effectiveness and limits of the existing legalframework governing protection orders. This article examines, first, the general regulatory structure applicable to protection orders, with a focus on the constraints placed upon judicial intervention where protective measures are adopted ex officio, in the absence of an express request from the victim. Secondly, the article offers a detailed analysis of the circumstances under which a court may lawfully substitute the victim's consentfor the purpose of authorising electronic monitoring, thereby permitting the installation of an electronic monitoring bracelet on the perpetrator in situations where an imminent threat to the victim's life is established. Through this dual approach, the study seeks to clarify both the boundaries and the potential expansion of judicial powers within the domain of victim protection. Key words: protection order, family violence, domestic violence, victim, perpetrator, electronic monitoring device. INTRODUCERE In contextul analizei fenomenului violentei domestice si a violentei in familie, este esentials delimitarea celor dous tipuri de conduite, intrucat notiunile sunt folosite, de cele