About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


2025 AUBD 1 (2025)

handle is hein.journals/aubd2025 and id is 1 raw text is: ANALELE UNIVERSITATII DIN BUCURESTI - SERIA DREPT Repere actuale in dinamica misurilor asiguratorii in materie penalI Conf. univ. dr. Andrei Zarafiu Facultatea de Drept, Universitatea din Bucuresti Drd. Liviu lordache Facultatea de Drept, Universitatea Babes-Bolyai din Cluj-Napoca Rezumat: Caracterul constrongdtor al celor mai importante acte de procedur6 prin care se realizeazu sarcinile care decurg din exercitiul functiilor judiciare este, fur6 indoial6, o trusutur6 intrinsec6 a raporturilor juridice procesual penale. Prin urmare, institutia mdsurilor procesuale reprezint6 una din institutiile fundamentale ale procedurii penale, indiferent de preponderenta elementelor de natur6 diferit6, continental6 sau adversial, sub influenta curora se manifest6 la un anumit moment al evolutiei sale sistemice. Chiar dac6 nu corespund pe deplin sferei notiunii de ,,materie penald' in sensul sou autonom, european, masurile asiguratorii, ca specie a institutiei masurilor procesuale, pustreaz6 toate caracteristicile genului din care fac parte. Impactul major asupra patrimoniului persoanelor, chiar al celor care nici mucar nu primesc uneori calituti procesuale, raportul uneori antagonic cu cea mai important6 specie a masurilor procesuale - masurile preventive, suprapunerea de ratiune procesuale din perspectiva exercitiului celor doud actiuni judiciare, iata coteva dintre provocurile functionale ale manifesturilor curente ale masurilor asiguratorii in materie penald. Studiul igi propune nu doar su treac6 in revist6 unele dintre aceste provocuri actuale ci si su ofere solutii adecvate unor controverse doctrinare si jurisprudentiale dezvoltate recent. Cuvinte cheie: durat6, mdsuri asiguratorii, sanctiune, limite. Current points of reference in the dynamics of precautionary measures in criminal matters Abstract: The compulsory nature of the most significant procedural acts used to fulfill the responsibilities arising from judicial functions is, without doubt, an intrinsic feature of procedural criminal legal relations. Consequently, the institution of procedural measures constitutes one of the fundamental pillars of criminal procedure, irrespective of the predominance of differing influences, continental or adversarial, that shape its systemic evolution at a given moment. Although they do not fully align with the scope of criminal matters in their autonomous European sense, precautionary measures, as a subset of procedural measures, retain all the defining characteristics of their category. The significant impact on individuals' patrimony, including those who, at times, lack procedural standing, the occasionally antagonistic relationship with preventive measures, the most prominent category of procedural actions, and the procedural rationale overlapping between the two judicial actions represent some of the functional challenges posed by the contemporary application of precautionary measures in criminal law. This study aims not only to review