About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


67 Antitrust Bull. 3 (2022)

handle is hein.journals/antibull67 and id is 1 raw text is: Article The Antitrust Bulletin 2022, Vol. 67(1) 3-1I The Internet of Change: Foreword to ©TheAuthor(s)2022 Article reuse guidelines: the Sym posium on the Google and sagepub.com/iournals-permissions DOI: 10.1 177/0003603X21 1070122 Facebook Cases journals.sagepub.com/home/abx OSAGE Harry First* Abstract In this Essay, which serves as a Foreword to the Antitrust Bulletin Symposium issue on the Google and Facebook cases, I argue that the Internet is now in the process of disrupting antitrust, as it has disrupted so many other areas of business and political life. This should not be surprising. The basic architecture of the Internet-decentralization and content agnosticism-enabled disruption; disruption is a feature not a bug. There is no reason to think that this disruption is now over and good reason to recognize its effect on antitrust. The Essay thus sketches out some of the ways in which the Internet of Change is now disrupting antitrust, including basic legal concepts (markets monopoly), economic models (reduced output is not the problem), and theories of harm. The Essay then provides short descriptions of the articles in the Symposium and concludes that although the Internet of Change has increased our impatience, we may have no choice but to await the slow and uncertain progress of the current litigation. Keywords Big tech platforms, monopolization, google, facebook, internet We shape our tools, and thereafter our tools shape us. -Marshall McLuhan In 1962, J.C.R. Licklider, a psychologist and engineer, came to Washington, D.C., to head the Advanced Research Projects Agency (known as ARPA or DARPA), a new office at the U.S. Department of Defense. He conceived of the idea of netting together several different computer centers using an agreed-upon language. Other scientists subsequently joined ARPA and saw the possibility of 1. Maybe it was McLuhan, or maybe not. See http://quoteinvestigator.com/2016/06/26/shape/ (pointing out that the quote probably originated with Winston Churchill, using buildings not tools; McLuhan's change was popularized by John Culkin writing about McLuhan's thought in 1967, but McLuhan himself may never have written it down). *Charles L. Denison Professor of Law, New York University School of Law, New York City, NY, USA Corresponding Author: Harry First, Charles L. Denison Professor of Law, New York University School of Law, 40 Washington Sq. South, New York, NY 10012, USA. Email: harry.first@nyu.edu