About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


11 Arb. L. Rev. 1 (2019)

handle is hein.journals/anlwrvw11 and id is 1 raw text is: The 'Sanctuary City' Syndrome Reaches Arbitration: State Supreme Courts Defy Federalization by Thomas E. Carbonneau Obdurate Opposition: As children eventually learn as they progress toward adulthood, permitting intense anger to invade the human spirit in the face of disagreement only brings momentary personal relief. A fit of temper harbors feelings of guilt, but no resolution. It mistakes monologue for dialogue and substitutes irrationality for self-control. It quickly becomes a self-inflicted exile and could lead the group to which the individual belongs to disown its member. The chaotic burst of emotions is a false attempt to reconcile the contradistinctive human need for asserting individuality and engaging in effective social communion. A. In New Hampshire: Finn v. Ballentine In Finn v. Ballentine,1 the parties disagreed about the monetary consequences of the termination of one of the company's founders and then CEO. The facts involved two separate arbitrations that addressed the aftermath of the corporate 'push out'. As a 'Finn v. Ballentine Partners, 169 N.H. 128 (N.H. 2016). (The factual account that follows in the text is distilled from various parts of the record in the court's opinion. It has been substantially reorganized and rewritten). 1