About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



62 Am. J. Legal Hist. 1 (2022)

handle is hein.journals/amhist62 and id is 1 raw text is: American Journal of Legal History, 2022, 62, 1-19
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajlh/njacOOl
Advance  Access Publication Date: 16 March 2022
Article





The Art of Interpretation or the Art of Construction?

The Case of Gestorum A Constitutional Treatise by

                    Andrzej Maksymilian Fredro

            Marek   Tracz-Tryniecki*'* and J. Patrick Higgins            **





                                    ABSTRACT
   Andrzej  Maksymilian  Fredro  was a  seventeenth-century Polish statesman whose
   works  on Polish legal theory and history are generally underappreciated. Whenever
   he is mentioned, it is generally as a defender of the institution liberum veto, which is
   nearly universally blamed for the decline and  eventually collapse of the Polish-
   Lithuanian Commonwealth.   This article is part of a contemporary attempt to reignite
   academic  interest in Fredro by bring his work to the attention of comparative consti-
   tutional scholars and legal historians, as well as to rehabilitate his reputation. More
   concretely, it examines the Gestorum, his first major work and a historical treatise, in
   order to recreate Fredro's theories of constitutional interpretation in contemporary
   theoretical parlance: his theory of casus qui facit leges as a constitutional moment,
   interpretatio/ratio legislatoris vs verbis legis as legislators' intentionalism vs textualism,
   and his interpretation vs explication as interpretation vs construction. These latter two
   sets of distinctions are particularly relevant to ongoing debates about originalistic
   approaches within comparative constitutional theory and legal history.


      I. ANDRZEJ MAKSYMILIAN FREDRO, GESTORUM, AND THE
                             HENRICIAN ARTICLES
Andrzej  Maksymilian   Fredro   (c.1620-79)  was  a leading Polish  statesman,  experi-
enced  in parliamentary life-both  in the Chamber   of Deputies and  in the Senate. He
belonged  to  a rich nobility of a Ruthenian province  (modern-day   western  Ukraine

*   Marek Tracz-Tryniecki, Faculty of Law and Administration at the University of Lodi, Poland; Member of
    the Alexis de Tocqueville Center for Political and Legal Thought; Room 3.05 at the Wydzial Prawa i
    Administracji, Uniwersytet Lddzi, ul (Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Lodi), Dr Stefana
    Kopcinskiego 8/12, 90-033, Lodi, Lddzkie, Poland. Tel: 48 42 635 40 21; Email: mtraczpwpia.uni.lodz.pl
 t  J. Patrick Higgins, PhD candidate at the Faculty of Law and Administration at the University of Lodi;
    Member of the Alexis de Tocqueville Center for Political and Legal Thought; Interdisciplinary Scholar at
    the Center for American Studies, Poznan, Poland, Ulica Sarnia 2 m 37, Lodi, Lddzkie, Poland. Tel: 48 42
    635 40 21; Email: Pat.higgins2014@gmail.com
 t  Sections 1-3 of this article has been written by M. Tracz-Tryniecki.
 ** Section 4 of this article has been written by J.P. Higgins.


 © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
 For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com


.  1