About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


42 Alaska L. Rev. i (2025-2026)

handle is hein.journals/allr42 and id is 1 raw text is: NOTE FROM THE EDITOR The Alaska Law Review is pleased to present our December 2025 issue, the first in our forty-second volume. I am deeply proud of our Alaska Law Review members' continued commitment to the Alaska legal community. This year, our members traveled to Anchorage and Fairbanks, strengthening connections and building new relationships with practitioners, academics, judges, and judicial clerks throughout the state. Now more than ever, genuine connections are essential to open pathways for shared knowledge, coordinated problem-solving, and collective resilience. We would like to thank not only the practitioners who submitted pieces for publication, but also everyone who offered their time and expertise on Alaskan law. This includes many of you who graciously opened your homes to us, volunteered to meet with our team, and provided thoughtful guidance to our student editors on their notes. This work would not be possible without your assistance. This issue features four articles and two student notes. Our first article is titled The Corpus Juris of (Alaska Native) Inherent Tribal Sovereignty by Nazune Menka, Assistant Professor of Law and Faculty Director of the Northwest Center for Indigenous Law (NCIL) at Seattle University School of Law. Menka argues that federal courts should apply the corpus juris, or whole body of law, canon of interpretation, including the in pari materia or affiliated statutes canon, to produce a more coherent and principled body of Indigenous law. Throughout the article, Menka demonstrates how Alaska Native nations have been particularly impacted by the explicit and implicit diminishment of traditional ways of life and critiques judicial tendencies to implicitly divest tribal sovereignty. The author reframes Alaska Native sovereignty as continuous, resilient, and legally supported when statutes are read as a part of the broader federal-Tribal legal framework. Next, Jon W. Katchen and Will R. Crowther address the changing administrative law landscape in their article Anchoring Deference: The Chevron Doctrine, Loper Bright, and Alaska Administrative Law. The article illustrates how Loper Bright creates an opportunity for Alaskan courts to address the state's disjointed administrative law jurisprudence. Katchen and Crowther explain that Alaska never adopted Chevron deference, instead relying on a mix of reasonable basis and substitution of judgment tests that have produced inconsistent and unpredictable outcomes. But now, the authors believe that the Alaska Supreme Court