About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



8 Akron Intell. Prop. J. 1 (2015)

handle is hein.journals/akrintel8 and id is 1 raw text is: 


DRATLER 1 (Do NOT DELETE)                                    4/4/2015 11:41AM


   FOOD PATENTS: THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES


                            Jay Dratler, Jr *

I.     Introduction .........................................................................  1
II.    Why Food is Different ...................................................... 2
       A . E conom  ics ..................................................................   3
       B . E volution ....................................................................   4
       C . C om  plexity ..................................................................  5
       D . A gronom   y ..................................................................   6
III.   Some Examples of Unintended Consequences .................. 6
       A. The Irish Potato Famine ............................................. 7
       B. The StoryofDDT ....................................................... 7
       C. The Story of Bisphenol A ............................................ 8
       D. Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) ................ 10
IV .   C onclusion  ......................................................................   12




                             I. INTRODUCTION

     All of intellectual property (IP) encourages innovation, at least in
part. Trademark protection promotes the creation and use of innovative
shorthand identifiers for products and services.1 Copyright encourages
creative  expression   in  words,   symbols, and    (today)  multimedia
productions.2    Trade-secrets   promote    innovation   by   protecting
investment in (usually productive) secrets from industrial espionage and
other   improper   means    of   acquisition.3  And   patents   protect


* Goodyear Professor of Intellectual Property, Emeritus, University of Akron School of Law.
    1. See Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Prods. Co., Inc., 514 U.S. 159, 163 (1995) (In principle,
trademark law, by preventing others from copying a source-identifying mark, 'reduce[s] the
customer's costs of shopping and making purchasing decisions.') (quotation omitted).
    2. See Feist Publ'ns, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., Inc., 499 U.S. 340, 349 (1991) (to
promote the Progress of Science,... copyright assures authors the right to their original
expression ....).
    3. Trade-secret protection also promotes commercial ethics and discourages unfair


DRATLER -1 (Do NOT DELETE)


4/4/2015 11-41 AM