About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



17 ConLawNOW 1 (2025)

handle is hein.journals/akjopal17 and id is 1 raw text is: 









           PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND
                THE FIFTH AMENDMENT


                             Scott Dodson*



     The  Supreme   Court  has avoided  clarifying the relationship
     between  federal-court  personal  jurisdiction, congressional
     statutes, and the Fifth Amendment.  Until now, that is. In June
     2025,  the  Court   decided  two  important   cases  involving
     constraints on afederal court's exercise ofpersonal jurisdiction
     outside of Rule  4(k)(1)(A), which typically ties federal-court
     personal jurisdiction to state-court personal jurisdiction. This
     brief essay explains and analyzes those cases, situating them in
     the Court's  larger agenda  for personal  jurisdiction. It also
     discusses some  open questions raised by the decisions and the
     role thatpersonal jurisdiction in the United States may now play
     on the global stage.


                             INTRODUCTION

     Personal jurisdiction is the power  of a court to bind a party to a
judgment.  Since Pennoyer   v. Neff,1 the Fourteenth Amendment's Due
Process  Clause has constrained the exercise of personal jurisdiction by
state courts. 2 The Fourteenth Amendment  permits state courts to exercise
personal jurisdiction in four  circumstances: (1) consent,3  (2) in-state
service on an individual, 4 (3) residency or citizenship in the state,5 and (4)


*Horace O. Coil Chair in Litigation, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr. Distinguished Professor of Law, and
Director of the Center for Litigation and Courts, University of California Law, San Francisco.
     1. 95 U.S. 714 (1878).
     2. U.S. CONST. amend. XIV, § 1 (No state shall ... deprive any person of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law .... ).
    3. See Mallory v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 600 U.S. 122, 126 (2023). For a discussion, see Scott
Dodson, The Complexities of Consent to Personal Jurisdiction, 113 CALIF. L. REV. 333 (2025).
    4. See Burnham v. Superior Court of California, 495 U.S. 604, 617-18 (1990).
    5. See Milliken v. Meyer, 311 U.S. 457, 463 (1940).